With the midterm elections over, I am left to wonder: how will the new Congress help struggling Americans who face losing their home. Will there be better and more streamlined mortgage modification programs? Will there be a shift in the economic climate that will promote jobs growth? Will Congress again take up the debate of amending the bankruptcy code to allow owners of single family residences to modify their loans in chapter 13?
I am not optimistic.
I admit that I have a stick in my craw. In May 2008, Massachusetts (a non-judicial foreclosure state) imposed a 90 day cooling off period to give time for defaulting home loan borrowers to work with their lenders. This summer, that period of time got extended to 150 days. Now, there are calls for a “foreclosure moratorium” in Massachusetts. I am not a fan of what I think is this inevitability, but before y’all think I’ve really fallen off my rocker, let me give you my perspective, and why I think we need to not just think about the moratorium – but for who and for how long.
Many have read media reports that decry HAMP (the Obama Administration’s purported “response” to the foreclosure crisis) and proclaim it is as lipstick on a pig. After two years have watching clients struggle in this program and few coming up with anything meaningful, I want to go on record as saying this:
HAMP is not only lipstick on a pig, but it’s continued existence only puts more light on the political impotence and the bankruptcy of leadership on both Beacon Hill and Capital Hill.
This was first posted in March 2008. More than two years later, the housing market is still in the pits, and more folks are opting to simply walk away from real estate they can no longer afford. Little has changed. And I dare say, it’s getting worse (although those seeking relection this year might want to disagree). If you own a condo or are in a homeowners association, the 2005 changes to the Bankruptcy Code force you to take some new issues into consideration.
My joyful descent into holiday weekend relaxation mode was interrupted by a Friday afternoon news story that caught my attention. Harmon Law Offices, a Massachusetts law firm, placed an ad in the New Bedford Standard Times announcing a land sale in Fairhaven.
The advertisement stated that the land “…shall not be sold, leased or rented to any person other than of the Caucasian race or to any entity of which any person other than of said race shall be a member, stockholder, officer or director.”
In a statement issued to FOX25, Harmon Law Offices said: “This notice involves a restriction that a previous owner placed on the property. We do not condone the language and do not believe that it would be enforceable. It is industry practice to include in the notice of sale the exact legal description as set forth in the mortgage. We have removed the language for future legal notices.”
As I mentioned on Twitter, and as I’ve been thinking about on the weekend, this news story raises a number of issues. (more…)
I read this today on HousingWire. Its publisher, Paul Jackson, poses the following “provocative” question about all of those modification plans and programs we keep hearing about (and I often write about):
[W]hat if ‘extend and pretend’ within our nation’s troubled mortgage markets is actually providing a lift to consumer spending?
Or, perhaps it can be said like this: what if consumer confidence statistics are actually being artificially buoyed by the extra cash homeowners (at homeowners ‘on paper’) who are not making mortgage payments, but instead, allocating those resources to things they would not otherwise purchase? (more…)
I received a call today from a client what we in the biz refer to as a “Soldiers and Sailor’s Notice.” I had met this caller a few weeks ago – and at that time, was told that the home mortgage and loan were “in review” by the lender and servicer. The caller was confident that a modification would be offered – and it would be one they could live with. I have “I’ll believe it when I see it” view. But today, the caller had this notice – which was found tied to the front door knob by a rubber bank. The caller’s question for me: “what does this mean?” (more…)
As more and more people try anything to avoid losing their homes, more and more people are getting scammed.
Here are two links with important information for homeowners contemplating modifications:
This from The Christian Science Monitor:
TransUnion, a credit reporting company, released its own numbers on Tuesday. At the end of the fourth quarter last year, it said, 6.89 percent of all US mortgage payments were at least 60 days past due. That was an all-time high.
Enter unscrupulous loan-modification companies. They advertise on late night-television or radio shows and sound as if they are linked to the Obama program.
“Many of them have the word ‘hope’ in their phone number,” says Jonathan Mintz, commissioner of the Consumer Affairs Department in New York. “But it’s a false hope.”
And here’s a link mentioned in the same article that describes, among other things, 6 Facts You Should Know About Loan Modification Scams.
Follow us on Twitter and on Facebook for the latest news (the links are to the right).
A homeowner decides that they want to sell their property – and get as much as they can from the sale even though it won’t pay the mortgage – by a short sale. But if the home is already in the foreclosure process, is it already too late to start thinking about that. It might be. Today, I’ll tackle the timing of the short sale decision, and why it something that if you’re going to consider it, you need to start thinking about it before you start missing those mortgage payments.
Barney Frank: Please Read This
I have a bone to pick with Barney Frank. Yesterday, a new multi-million dollar loan program was rolled out by HUD. Sharing in the local announcements were local Congressmen and other elected officials.
According to a Boston Herald report:
Boston.com reported the program a little differently, but in substance, it’s the same.
That smells a bit like “hope.” So I’m afraid the sound of this program ruffles my feathers a bit. But what compels me to write is this quote, which also appeared in the same Boston Herald report:
Really?
I’m going on record: Mr. Frank, I’m no anarchist I find this program offensive. So today, I write this blog to you.
(more…)
Tags: Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention & Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Chapter 13, Commentary, Consumer Protection, foreclosure, Homes, homesteads and real estate, In the News, Mortgages and Foreclosures, Yep. We're in trouble.
Posted in Bankruptcy, Chapter 13, Foreclosures and Real Estate | No Comments »