Posts Tagged ‘Mortgage and Foreclosure’

When Should You Start Thinking About Doing a Short Sale?

A homeowner decides that they want to sell their property – and get as much as they can from the sale even though it won’t pay the mortgage – by a short sale.  But if the home is already in the foreclosure process, is it already too late to start thinking about that.  It might be.  Today, I’ll tackle the timing of the short sale decision, and why it something that if you’re going to consider it, you need to start thinking about it before you start missing those mortgage payments.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Short Sales & Foreclosure: Perception & Reality

Many people struggling to pay the mortgages are motivated to consider a short sale.   I am often told that it is considered because of their concern that if a short sale is not done, and the property is allowed to foreclosure, they will never be able to own a home again.  Today, I want to tackle the perception of that…and present a bit of reality, from my point of view.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Short Sale Option

A short sale is when a homeowner sells property, but for less than the amount due on the outstanding mortgage.  The lender agrees to release/discharge the mortgage on the property to allow the property to change hands to a new owner.  Now, there seems to be a belief out there that short-selling a property is better than allowing it to slip into foreclosure.  I’m not going to agree or disagree on this – because what’s good for some people, is just not good for others.  But since there is a resurgence of media reports that former homeowners are “surprised” to learn they are still responsible for their debts to the bank even after a foreclosure, I thought I would revisit the subject and list out some pros and cons as well as perceptions and realities. (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Predatory Lending: Beyond the Buzzwords

A few years ago, someone wrote something somewhere (it wasn’t here – I swear) that if you were the victim of predatory lending, you could get a free house.  Actually, I recall someone at a legal seminar (not here in Massachusetts – I swear) suggesting that it could be done… which sent some colleagues of mine into a tizzy thinking they could easily get free houses for people who were preyed upon by bad bankers.   If that could be done with such ease, then there would be firms not only doing this work, but we’d be reading billboards declaring their success rates on the sides of highways.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Under Water, Walking Away & My Two Cents

Over the holiday weekend, there were a number of press reports about a discussion paper, Under Water and Not Walking Away: Shame, Fear and the Social Management of the Housing CrisisReportedly Brent T. White, an Associate Professor at the University of Arizona’s James E. Rogers College of Law advocates that homeowners who are underwater (meaning, the outstanding mortgage balance[s] is more than the value of the home…is now, or in some cases, will ever be) should simply walk away from their obligations and not look back without feeling a bit of guilt.  Obviously this all got my attention, but before I took to this here blog and declared “You Have Got to be Kidding Me!” (which at first glance seemed like the most expedient way to address it), I opted to read the discussion paper (rather than just the abstract).  Before you click the link below, pour yourself a fresh cup of tea.

Here’s my take:

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

20 Months Too Late

When a homeowner refinances their mortgage, the lender must give certain notices under the federal Truth in Lending Act, also referred to as TILA.  For a number of good reasons, homeowners must be given a notice that informs them of their rights to rescind their mortgage.  But what happens if the notice does not strictly comply with what TILA’s requirements?  Does any flaw in the notice permit a homeowner to rescind a mortgage?  On June 11, the First Circuit Court of Appeals had an opportunity to answer that question.

The case involved a borrower who had been given a copy of a rescission notice at closing.  The notice stated:

You are entering into a transaction that will result in a mortgage/lien/security interest on our home.  You have a legal right under federal law to cancel this transaction, without cost, within THREE BUSINESS DAYS from whichever of the following events occurs LAST:

(1)  The date of the transaction, which is ______; or

(2)  The date you receive your Truth in Lending disclosures; or

(3)  The date you received this notice of your right to cancel.

The homeowner also received information on how to cancel the transaction (i.e., how and when notices must be sent).

Under the Federal Reserve Board’s regulations, specifically, Regulation Z, when a homeowner rescinds the mortgage, the homeowner is “not …liable for any amount, including any finance charge” and the lender “shall return any money or property that has been given to anyone in connection with the transaction.”  Now if the notices the homeowner receives do not comply with TILA, or if the homeowner never received any notices, the homeowner has up to three years to rescind the mortgage, rather than just the three days.  Three years versus three days:  that can be particularly advantageous to a homeowner seeking to refinance when interest rates are lower, or if a loan that seemed like a good idea at the time has now revealed that it’s really not a good idea at all.

This homeowner argued that he was able to rescind the loan 20 months after closing because the “date of transaction” line in the notice was left blank.  However, the date of the transaction was stamped on the upper right hand corner of the notice (although not precisely in the blank line).  But that was not the only issue that worked against this homeowner.

The homeowner attended the closing and admitted receiving the notices at the closing.  The only possible issue was that the closing occurred on a Saturday, and it might be difficult to determine exactly when the three days expired (i.e., the following Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday).  But the argument here was not over a few days, it was over a few months.  This homeowner was effectively arguing a mere technical violation of the notice that the Court found would impose a penalty on the lender while at the same time allow a windfall on the homeowner. For those reasons, the Court found that there was no way the blanks misled the homeowner as to when his rescission rights expired, and his request to rescind was untimely.

What options does this homeowner have?  It’s tough to say.  The decision does not discuss the homeowner’s income and expenses or whether there is a possibility that the homeowner can benefit from a bankruptcy filing.  But remember, if the home is the principal residence, modifying the loan in a bankruptcy will not be possible.

Read the Court decision here.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Sunday News

A fellow bankruptcy attorney shared this article that appeared in last month’s New York Times Magazine.  I see in it some of the same difficulties I see in clients.  It also makes me question how “half-empty” the glass really is.  Although in the interest of full disclosure, the writer has a book coming out.  In other news…

ONE FLAG! Six Flags Amusement Parks files for Chapter 11 protection.

Nashua NH Telegraph:  Welcome to the New Consumer Economy.

Boston Herald:  Consumer spending may never be the same as it was.

South Coast: Home values could take years to recover.  We also could be hitting bottom (I’m not being sarcastic, it says the market “could be a reading a valley”).  I could also be a ledge (ok, that was sarcastic).

Nantucket foreclosures.  I wonder if these homeowners claim their loan was predatory?  I also have to question whether it was.

A bad apple is removed from the barrel: Brockton lawyer settles fraud suit with the Massachusetts Attorney General’s office.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Handwriting on the Wall

Over the last two years or so, I’ve seen a particularly troubling trend with homeowners seeking bankruptcy protection.  It is making bankruptcies unnecessarily complicated and expensive.  It also puts them at a greater risk of failing – at least once (which at the very least, makes it more expensive).  It’s the trend for them to wait until the very last minute to actually consider bankruptcy as an option.  This is a bad, bad idea.

Years ago, I would hear from callers who had oppressive credit card debt, medical bills and had experienced some sort of major life event: job loss, medical crisis, death in the family, or divorce.  That debt was getting out of control, but their real estate was usually current….or perhaps was approaching default but not in foreclosure.  They could see the handwriting on the wall; they could see the storm clouds on the horizon.  They needed to prepare for what they thought was inevitable. Nowadays, it’s usually quite different.

Now I typically hear from callers who are facing foreclosure within 2-3 weeks, and if they (and I) are lucky, they have more than a month before the scheduled auction.  The reasons are essentially the same: many are losing jobs, wages and overtime is getting frozen or eliminated, mortgage payments and other debts have creeped up.  There is also the occasional debtor with a health care issue or some other extraordinary set of circumstances. The bankruptcy filing can delay the sale, and give the debtor an opportunity to reorganize finances or even secure a loan modification.  But think about this – if you Google “GM Bankruptcy” you will see that pundits were talking about GM’s bankruptcy last fall (look under archives).  I am willing to bet GM was at least thinking about it was well.  I’m also willing to venture that GM was preparing for the possibility of having to file bankruptcy.  For homeowners, there’s no good excuse to be waiting until the auction has been scheduled and the notice has been published to be at least considering and planning a bankruptcy filing.  Think of it as Plan B.

Unfortunately, to homeowners who are attempting to secure a modification of their loan, I have some bad news.  Lenders are not all that organized themselves: it’s not altogether uncommon for the foreclosure department who is handling the auction not to be speaking to the loss mitigation department who is handling the modification and vice-versa.  Perhaps this is what happens when we let companies get too big to fail.  I realize that this lack of communication protocol may seem strange if not completely asinine, but this has been my experience, and my colleagues who represent lenders have shared their frustrations with me on this issue as well.  Thus, your request for modification will not necessarily stall a foreclosure.

Of course, filing a properly prepared chapter 13 bankruptcy petition takes quite a bit of work.  And documents.  And information.  And good counsel.  Tax returns need to be filed.  Pay stubs or payment advices need to be gathered.  Property needs to be valued.  The Bankruptcy Code requires that documents be filed within a certain period of time after the case is filed. A typical bankruptcy petition – along with a chapter 13 plan – can exceed well over 45 pages.  And chapter 13 plans require some thought, strategy and expertise.

If a debtor seeks bankruptcy protection but does not have this information properly prepared when the case needs to be filed, an Order to Update will enter.  The Bankruptcy Court will order that the debtor file all documents by a date certain: anywhere from 3-14 days.  Need an extension?  You might get one.  You also might not.

I am increasingly finding that debtors simply do not have the information needed within the 3-14 day period.  Sometimes I can get an extension.  Sometimes I cannot.  Sometimes the pro se debtor cannot get one and that is the first time they pick up the phone and speak to a bankruptcy attorney.  The delay, the motions, and frankly, the hunt for this information under the pressure of a strict time deadline only adds to the expense and increases the risk for error.  It also does nothing to quell the anxiety of what is undeniably a stressful situation.  Sadly, this is all fueled by debtors who are considering bankruptcy only within weeks, days or in worse case scenarios hours before a foreclosure auction is scheduled to move forward.  And in many cases, their delays prove costly, and may also lead to their case imploding.

If you are a homeowner who is serious about saving their home and attempting to keep what you have worked hard for, then you must consider bankruptcy as an option at the earliest opportunity.  This way, you can start gathering information and be ready to go if the mortgage modification doesn’t come through.

Of course, there are others out there who I know are telling folks not to think about bankruptcy.  There are others who mislead with claims that bankruptcy protection is harder to get now.  If you rule it out the bankruptcy option without getting the facts, speaking with a bankruptcy attorney, and understanding process and what will be expected of you in that process, I promise you this: you will regret it.

Anyone that tells you differently is selling you something.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Cramdown Bill is Dead

From MSNBC:

A dozen Democrats joined Republicans in the 45-51 vote to scuttle the bill, which Obama had said was important to saving the economy and promised to push through Congress. But facing stiff opposition from banks, Obama did little to pressure lawmakers who worried it would encourage bankruptcy filings and spike interest rates.

More here.

I remind everyone that next year, 2010, is an election year.  If you want to know who to blame, here’s the roll call vote.

  • Share/Bookmark

Mortgage Modification/Cramdown Bill Update

From Today’s Washington Post:

Days before an expected vote, Senate leaders yesterday touted their version of a proposal to allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages, but have yet to secure the support of the financial services industry and face fierce opposition that could derail the proposal again.

The characterization of the opposition being “fierce” is unfortunate, but it appears to be accurate:

“I hope we can muster the courage and find the votes, although I know it will be hard,” (Senate Majority Whip) Durbin (D-Ill) said on the Senate floor yesterday. Durbin has been pushing the measure for more than two years. “It’s hard to imagine that today the mortgage bankers would have clout in this chamber, but they do.”

More here.

For more on the President’s Foreclosure Prevention Plan, click here.

  • Share/Bookmark