Chapter 7 debtors who have debt that is secured by property have a number of options, and among them is reaffirmation. A simple way of describing it: when a debtor reaffirms a debt, they are removing the debt from the bankruptcy and are agreeing to pay it. Such agreements – to be enforceable – must be reduced to writing and approved by the Bankruptcy Court. But since 2005, when Congress amended the Bankruptcy Code, attorneys who represent chapter 7 debtors have been struggling with a dual rule: that of attorney and counselor, and that of judge.
Posts Tagged ‘homesteads and real estate’
Episode 7
Saturday, November 13th, 2010
Are bankruptcy exemptions funny? Perhaps only when Jake & I are talking about them.
A Massachusetts Foreclosure Moratorium? Yes, but…
Monday, October 4th, 2010
I admit that I have a stick in my craw. In May 2008, Massachusetts (a non-judicial foreclosure state) imposed a 90 day cooling off period to give time for defaulting home loan borrowers to work with their lenders. This summer, that period of time got extended to 150 days. Now, there are calls for a “foreclosure moratorium” in Massachusetts. I am not a fan of what I think is this inevitability, but before y’all think I’ve really fallen off my rocker, let me give you my perspective, and why I think we need to not just think about the moratorium – but for who and for how long.
Hope is a 4-Letter Word
Sunday, October 3rd, 2010
Many have read media reports that decry HAMP (the Obama Administration’s purported “response” to the foreclosure crisis) and proclaim it is as lipstick on a pig. After two years have watching clients struggle in this program and few coming up with anything meaningful, I want to go on record as saying this:
HAMP is not only lipstick on a pig, but it’s continued existence only puts more light on the political impotence and the bankruptcy of leadership on both Beacon Hill and Capital Hill.
20/5 Redux: Thoughts on When to “Walk Away”
Thursday, August 26th, 2010
This was first posted in March 2008. More than two years later, the housing market is still in the pits, and more folks are opting to simply walk away from real estate they can no longer afford. Little has changed. And I dare say, it’s getting worse (although those seeking relection this year might want to disagree). If you own a condo or are in a homeowners association, the 2005 changes to the Bankruptcy Code force you to take some new issues into consideration.
Staying Out of the Valley of Disappointment
Tuesday, August 17th, 2010
Some Massachusetts homeowners have this peculiar belief that a homestead declaration is the legal equivalent of a real Chinese fire wall (i.e., with flames). That it keeps creditors at bay, allowing you to live in bliss in your home until you die or get sick of it and want to move on to a greener patch of grass. That’s not entirely the case. Not all debts are covered and not all creditors can be kept at bay. If you’re up to your eyeballs in debt, relying on the Homestead Declaration and only on the Homestead Declaration to keep your home from creditors will lead you to an unhappy and mythical place I call the Valley of Disappointment.
I came up with the Valley of Disappointment because I thought it seemed like a humourous metaphor But then, just to be safe, I did a websearch and just want to caution my readers not to confuse my mythical and metaphorical Valley of Disappointment, with Disappointment Valley which is: (1) a real valley located in Colorado; as well as (2) a documentary which according to IMDb “examines the plight of America’s wild horses and the rapidly deteriorating condition of our wild Public Lands.” Any similarity between my imaginary Valley and the real thing or the movie is totally unintentional and accidental…and kind of scary.
I envision the Valley of Disappointment as a place where none of the stores are open when you need them to be, and those that are all have the products you don’t want at prices you can afford, and products you need at prices that shock the conscience. I envision it as a place where the traffic lights stay green for only three seconds before they jump to red, where they stay for 3 minutes. It’s a place where things just don’t go your way, and you feel pretty powerless to do anything about it. It’s generally always cloudy or rainy. The street signs are all confusing, and it can be tough to navigate your way through it or out of it. Sometimes you just don’t know how you got there. Other times you do, and that knowledge can sometimes make it all worse. But enough about what I envision about the Valley of Disappoitment… I was talking about Homestead rights:
Under Water, Walking Away & My Two Cents
Tuesday, December 1st, 2009
Over the holiday weekend, there were a number of press reports about a discussion paper, Under Water and Not Walking Away: Shame, Fear and the Social Management of the Housing Crisis. Reportedly Brent T. White, an Associate Professor at the University of Arizona’s James E. Rogers College of Law advocates that homeowners who are underwater (meaning, the outstanding mortgage balance[s] is more than the value of the home…is now, or in some cases, will ever be) should simply walk away from their obligations and not look back without feeling a bit of guilt. Obviously this all got my attention, but before I took to this here blog and declared “You Have Got to be Kidding Me!” (which at first glance seemed like the most expedient way to address it), I opted to read the discussion paper (rather than just the abstract). Before you click the link below, pour yourself a fresh cup of tea.
Here’s my take:
Lending to Unemployed: Frankly, There’s Got to be a Better Way
Tuesday, November 17th, 2009
Yesterday I tweeted about Barney Frank’s idea of giving unemployed homeowners access to low interest loans. The theory is that it help fills a gap in the Obama Administration’s plan to address foreclosures caused by unemployment. I think this is a bad idea (and a bit of mid-term election posturing). And I think there’s a sounder way to help unemployed homeowners. (more…)
Property Insurance and Chapter 13
Wednesday, July 8th, 2009
If you’re thinking about Chapter 13, it’s important for you to know that your real property (real estate) must be insured. Increasingly, I am finding that homeowners are allowing their policies to lapse. This poses a problem – especially for debtors who wait until the last minute to file.
If real estate is not insured, this will pose problems for any debtor hoping to reap the benefits of Chapter 13. It’s also important to know that not only is insurance required, but a Massachusetts Local Bankruptcy Court rule mandates that evidence of insurance be filed with the Bankruptcy Court along with the petition. If it is not filed, the Court can dismiss the case.
Sometimes, the mortgage payment also includes an amount that’s held in escrow for taxes and insurance. When a homeowner stops making monthly mortgage payments, the lender may – or may not – continue paying taxes and insurance. If the lender doesn’t pay the insurance, the lender will obtain Force Place insurance. This policy protects the lender. It does not protect the homeowner, the homeowner’s family, or the contents of the home and it is not acceptable for Chapter 13 purposes.
If you’re contemplating a Chapter 13 – check on the homeowner’s insurance. Be sure it is current and up to date. Be sure that the premiums are paid. Be sure that any special riders that you want are included, such as special protections for jewelry, electronics, and other items. Keep those documents handy and in a safe place – because you will need them if you’re thinking about filing Chapter 13. The time to do this is now, not on the eve of a foreclosure auction – which will only cause delay, increase anxiety and perhaps even be more expensive.
Barney Frank: Please Read This
I have a bone to pick with Barney Frank. Yesterday, a new multi-million dollar loan program was rolled out by HUD. Sharing in the local announcements were local Congressmen and other elected officials.
According to a Boston Herald report:
Boston.com reported the program a little differently, but in substance, it’s the same.
That smells a bit like “hope.” So I’m afraid the sound of this program ruffles my feathers a bit. But what compels me to write is this quote, which also appeared in the same Boston Herald report:
Really?
I’m going on record: Mr. Frank, I’m no anarchist I find this program offensive. So today, I write this blog to you.
(more…)
Tags: Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention & Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Chapter 13, Commentary, Consumer Protection, foreclosure, Homes, homesteads and real estate, In the News, Mortgages and Foreclosures, Yep. We're in trouble.
Posted in Bankruptcy, Chapter 13, Foreclosures and Real Estate | No Comments »