Posts Tagged ‘Discharge of Debts’

CareOne: What’s Behind Those Commercials?

As I was watching the news the other night, I saw this commercial for CareOne Credit. The name rang in my head – and then it hit me:  I had recently read about them in a case while doing some research  Since the judge’s observations in that case and his comments were stuck in my head – and since I am seeing these commercials more and more -  I thought I would share them here.

The Case

In late 2006, Debra Wood was struggling with debt – and after apparently seeing an ad, she contacted CareOne Credit Counseling.  When she contacted CareOne, she was referred to Consumer Law Associates, LLC (CLA).  CLA then gave her documents to start her into a debt management plan – which would be administered by Ruther and Associates, LLC (RA).  They describe themselves as a “national law firm dedicated to consumer debt reduction.”  As the facts of this case unfold, you’ll see what that description is inaccurate – at best.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

When You Discover that You Are a Creditor in a Bankruptcy Case…

Last week, I was in the clerk’s office and overheard two people ask the clerk which forms needed to be filed in a bankruptcy case.  But this person was not a debtor – they were a creditor.  Their landlord had filed bankruptcy.  The former tenant was looking for their security deposit back, and was going to sue the debtor in small claims.  I couldn’t help myself – and I butted in.

“You need relief from the automatic stay.”

“The stay applies even to me?” one asked.

“It applies to everyone.”

After that short exchange, I thought I would put together a short checklist of things to do when your landlord – or someone else you know who also happens to owe you money – files a petition seeking bankruptcy protection.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Social Networking Sites and Bankruptcy: The Intersection is Dead Ahead

There are a growing number of social networking sites out there on the world-wide-interwebs that people are latching onto.   In fact, both the firm and I have latched onto Facebook (we just lauched our Fan page this week!).  So I was intrigued after recently reading that a growing number of domestic relations attorneys were beginning to scour sites like Facebook in an effort to get information on opposing parties.  At first, I found it merely interesting as I once practiced domestic relations law.  But the subject gnawed on me for several days.   Then, earlier this week, I read that collection agencies are trolling sites like Facebook looking for debtors.  Then it dawned on me: if collectors are doing it, and divorce attorneys are doing it, there really is nothing stopping any party in any legal case from looking into Facebook or other social networking sites in an effort to gain a legal advantage of any opposing party.  And this rings true in the world of bankruptcy.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Who Really Files Bankruptcy?

What leads a person to the steps of the bankruptcy court seeking relief from debt? That is not an easy question to answer – although there are some out there who may think they know the answer. But as I was digesting a recent opinion out of the Bankruptcy Court in the Northern District of Texas, I read the following:

Anecdotally, this court notes that it sees all sorts of consumer debtors come through the bankruptcy system. At one end of the spectrum, there are individuals who have been plagued with many bad circumstances that have led to their financial demise-such as health problems, injuries, medical bills, job loss or instability, divorce, or death of a bread winner. At the other end of the spectrum, there are individuals who have been blessed with good health and adequate jobs and resources, and yet have somehow created a mountain of consumer debt that they (and probably their creditors) should have known could never be repaid. Some of these latter individuals have even engaged in some sort of fraud along the way-perhaps in a loan application at some point, or with intentional avoidance and nonpayment of taxes, or by hiding assets before entering into bankruptcy.

But the vast majority of debtors this court sees fall somewhere between the two extremes. They are individuals who probably cannot honestly blame “bad luck” as the cause of all of their woes. And many of them have made more poor choices than wise ones, and such choices have finally caught up with them.

So what does this mean, and why am I sharing it with you?  The easiest answer is that it is my experience that the court is right. However, there’s a rather significant “but…”

Unless we’re talking about a nefarious character with no sense of right and wrong, most people do not cheerfully enter the bankruptcy process. By the time they enter bankruptcy, or are at least considering it, they regret decisions they made. They know some of their choices were unwise. However, that does not mean that a debtor is not deserving of a chance to start over.

As I continued to read the Texas decision, I learned that the debtors had inconsistent income, high expenses, and some peculiar explanations for their debt.  Also, the facts seemed to indicate a bit of ambivalence as to how they came into the financial predicament they were in, and why they sought bankruptcy relief. T heir case was dismissed because the court deemed it to be an abuse of Chapter 7. I did not summarize the case because I do not want people to read more into the facts but also because I want to assure readers who are facing bankruptcy that there’s something far more important in this case than the kind of car the debtor was driving or when they bought it.  What’s more important is that they have a sense of who files bankruptcy and who is entitled to the relief afforded by the code.

Far too many talking heads (and readers know who they are) characterize people who file bankruptcy as buffoons with entitlement complexes. Making bad decisions is not evidence of an entitlement complex. Making bad decisions, standing alone, is also not evidence of fraud or other unscrupulous activity.  Making bad decisions is evidence of being human (which by all appearances, some of those talking heads might be similarly viewed as such…although I often wonder).

Of course, whether a decision is so bad that it would effectively rule out bankruptcy as an option can only be determined after a careful review of the facts by someone who knows the law. As this court decision points out, there is no one cause that pushes people into bankruptcy and there is no bright line profile of a person who files bankruptcy. Those that attempt to convince the masses otherwise only breed prejudice and fear where it need not exist.

  • Share/Bookmark

A Holiday Shopping Tip (or Warning)

With Black Friday soon upon us, and the holiday shopping season, I want to get a message out to those folks who are struggling. Perhaps there are folks who know they are going to lose their jobs after the New Year. Perhaps there are folks who have been using credit to get by and now see a bankruptcy petition on the horizon. Perhaps these folks are figuring that they will have one last holiday with really great gifts courtesy of their credit card companies. If you’re reading this, and you’re thinking “wow, he’s totally speaking to me (or about my friend or relative)!” please keep reading.

One thing many consumers do not know is that when you buy “large-ticket” item, it may also come with it a security interest. In other words, that purchase may be a gift, but it may also be collateral. The lender (the store, or the bank that finances the store’s credit cards or credit lines) assumes a security interest. This is something to think about as you’re eyeing that appliance or jewelry. Will it prevent you from filing bankruptcy? Probably not. Will it complicate things? It just might. You may have to pay the debt even if you file bankruptcy or you may have to surrender the collateral. Or you might hear from the creditor months or years after the bankruptcy is over.

Last minute purchases can also get you into hot water. Using a credit card when you have no intention of paying the debt back can be considered fraud. Debts incurred through fraud cannot be discharged. In addition, such actions could be considered bad faith, and might lead to a dismissal or a denial of discharge, depending on the circumstances. What does any of this mean? The short answer is more attorney fees, more anxiety and the possibility that the bankruptcy case will not go as smooth as it otherwise could.

If you’re contemplating bankruptcy, don’t use credit cards for holiday shopping. Speak with an attorney. The last thing any debtor needs is to make a tough situation even worse.

  • Share/Bookmark

When Things Go Very Wrong

Last week I received a phone call from someone who wanted to know about the status of a bankruptcy case. It was not their bankruptcy, rather the case of another person. Apparently, the caller was a creditor of the bankruptcy debtor. The caller had a case pending in state court and wanted to know if the claim was discharged in the bankruptcy. While we were chatting, I pulled up the case on PACER. As I started to get more information and I was reviewing the documents, I came to realize that not only was the claim discharged, but the attorney representing the caller in the state court matter committed malpractice. What happened here is a lesson for anyone finding themselves brought into a bankruptcy case.

In May of 2007, the debtor filed bankruptcy which put the automatic stay into effect. In August, the caller’s attorneys filed a Motion for Relief from Stay. By a look at the document, the attorneys did not have experience in bankruptcy matters: the motion was barely two pages long and presented nothing substantive for the court to consider. Their lack of experience was also evident by the fact that they did not file electronically (Bankruptcy Courts – like all federal courts – use electronic case filing). And finally, they also did not pay the requisite filing fee (a fact which is readily available from a number of sources, including the court’s website).

The Clerk issued a Notice of Filing Fee due, and ordered that the payment be made by 8-27-07. The Certificate of Service from the Clerk stated the Notice was mailed on August 19, 2007 to the local attorney. However, payment was not made until 9-5-07. As a result, the motion was denied.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Debtor Can’t Reopen Case to Enforce Discharge. Yet.

In an October 3 decision, a Massachusetts Bankruptcy Court ruled that a debtor could not reopen her chapter 7 bankruptcy to commence an adversary proceeding to enforce the discharge.

The debtor was involved in an auto accident in 2003 which resulted in the death of another person. Later in the year, the Administrator of the Estate accepted $100,000 from the debtor’s insurance company and signed a release. In December 2004, the debtor filed her chapter 7 bankruptcy petition and received a discharge in April 2005. In the petition, she did not list the Estate as a creditor. There were no assets to distribute to creditors.

Then, in January 2006 the debtor heard from the “successor” Administrator of the Estate.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Inaccurate Schedules Lead to Discharge Denial

There is any number of ways that a debtor can get a discharge denied, and certainly, I have blogged about them here. One of the big ones is the most obvious: lying. I came across a recent case out of the Southern District of New York that should serve as a warning to all debtors – and especially to those debtors who think they can file bankruptcy without an experienced bankruptcy attorney. This pro se debtor was a former attorney (his license was suspended). There’s nothing in the record that suggests he was experienced in bankruptcy…but he still should have known better.

The case was filed in August 2006. In his original schedules, the debtor listed his monthly net income as $2,144 and expenses of $2,427. Among the expenses was $500 per month in support for “additional dependants not living” with the debtor. He also did not indicate that he had any student loan obligations, and wrote “0” in the box that specifically asks if the debtor has student loans.

A few days after filing the petition, the debtor amended his schedules showing an increase in his monthly expenses. In this amendment, he claimed that his expenses had increased, and identified a monthly domestic support obligation of $600 (and he identified the creditor to whom he owed the child support). He also stated he spent $20 per month on recreation.

Only 9 days latter, the debtor amended his schedules to identify a new creditor: a phone company who had an unsecured non-priority claim of $190.

In March 2007, the schedules were amended again. This time, the debtor added additional creditors and showed that his income was $2,840 and his expenses were $2,829. His recreation expenses were now $140 per month.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Where Did It All Go?

Keeping good financial records is always a good idea and if you’re filing bankruptcy, having good records on hand will help your case go smoothly. As married debtors in the Western District of Pennsylvania recently learned, not having them can lead to a denial of the Chapter 7 discharge.

The debtor, who was described as a “vintage automobile enthusiast who restored such vehicles and sold them to third parties,” was also the sole shareholder and president of a start-up company. The company borrowed (and he and his wife personally guaranteed) about $1.4 million. To obtain the loans, the debtor and his wife prepared financial statements.

According to the financial statements prepared in 2003 (which were signed with the acknowledgment that false statements could lead to criminal prosecution), the debtors stated that they had personal assets that totaled $2,185,000 and that their liabilities totaled only $328,000. The assets include a homestead worth $550,000, household goods and furnishings that were worth $75,000 and automobiles and automobile parts that totaled $750,000. The business failed and closed its doors before it ever started operating.

By the time the debtors filed bankruptcy, they had already lost their home in foreclosure. But according to their schedules, their assets had diminished to about $32,000 while their liabilities totaled about $1.5 million. Their household goods, which were worth $75,000 were now worth only $3,026. The automobiles, which were declared on the financial statements as being worth $300,000, were now worth only $3,140. The auto parts, which were previously disclosed as being worth $450,000 were now worth only $3,200. The schedules and statements also showed other discrepancies and raised other questions, but they are too numerous to list here. Needless to say, the US Trustee and some creditors had one very important question they wanted answered.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Massachusetts Debt Collector Gets Sanctioned by Florida Bankruptcy Court

A Massachusetts debt collector along with the creditor has been sanctioned by the bankruptcy court in Florida for violating the discharge injunction. On April 4, 2007 Olson filed a Chapter 7 petition in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On his schedules, he listed a debt owed to Wells Fargo Financial in the amount of $976. Two separate addresses for Wells Fargo appeared on the creditor matrix. His creditor’s meeting was held on May 3 and on July 3 he received his discharge.

In a letter dated March 10, 2008, Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC in Haverill sent a letter to the debtor demanding payment in the principal amount of $976.71 and with interest, a total balance of $1,353.65. The debt was now purportedly held by North Star Capital Acquisitions. Payment was demanding by the close of business on March 31, 2008. On March 18, 2008, the Debtor moved to report his bankruptcy case, and that motion was allowed on March 31.

On that same date, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Order to Show Cause. The order directed Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC and North Star Capital Acquisition LLC to appear before the court through counsel on April 21, 2008 to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for making a demand for payment on the debtor. The order was mailed to the CEO of North Star at its New York address and at its agent’s address in St. Paul, Minnesota. It was mailed to Nelson, Watson & Associates LLC at its Merrimack Street address in Haverhill (the order reflects the same address that appears on Nelson’s website).

April 21, 2008 came, and no one appeared. This is a problem for two reasons: (1) it’s a court order and when the court orders you to appear before it, you do so and (2) no one got to hear their side of the story. No even a written statement was field. It was as if they played possum.

You can imagine that this displeased the court. On April 28, the court held Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC along with North Stat in contempt of court because they failed to attend the hearing and they violated the discharge injunction. Both were ordered to pay fines in the amount of $2,500. If they did not pay their fines by May 30, the court stated that it would issue a separate order directing the US Marshal to APPREHEND David Paris, CEO of North Star and George Nelson, III, Manager of Nelson, Watson & Associates,LLC for the purpose of “bringing [them] before the Court to explain [their] contemptuous conduct and why further sanctions should not imposed.” They were also ordered to obey the discharge injunction.

On May 6 Nelson paid its find and North Star paid on May 13. The case remains open.

As an aside, it takes less than 30 seconds to determine if someone has filed bankruptcy. Debtor’s attorneys routinely do it as part of their due diligence in preparing bankruptcy petitions. Since there is no response from Nelson, we’re all left wondering: did you check and send the letter anyway? or were you just negligent? Without an explanation, we’ll never really know the truth (but I encourage them to chime in and comment if they get wind of this blog post).

In re Olson, US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida at Fort Lauderdale, 07-12387.

  • Share/Bookmark