Posts Tagged ‘Credit and Debt’

Marcal Seeks Chapter 11 Protection

Years ago, I remember the big push for homeowners to convert from oil or electric heat to natural gas. At that time, it was touted as cheap and clean. While I am no chemist, I have no reason to believe it is no longer clean. However, based on many discussions with clients over the past couple of years, I have no doubt it is no longer cheap, and for some, it’s what’s pushing them over the financial edge and ultimately in my office.

So I was a little taken aback to learn that the 900 employee strong Marcal Paper company filed for bankruptcy protection today. The Chairman and Chief Executive, as well as the founder’s grandson, Nicholas R. Marcalus had this to say:

The price increases in energy have proven to be immensely difficult. Demands by our lenders created liquidity pressures which caused the company to file for the continued restructuring under Chapter 11.

We believe that the decision to file, although difficult, was in the best long-term interest of our company, employees, customers, vendors and other valued business partners. We plan to take advantage of the opportunities presented by this restructuring to address both our financial and operational issues in order to position the company for long-term success.

  • Share/Bookmark

Is Boston’s Housing Bubble Deflating?

I would vote yes. According to The Warren Group, “Massachusetts home sales fell by double-digit percentages in October, and the median sale price of single-family homes dropped 6.9 percent compared to October 2005…” And there’s more: “condominium sales dropped 19.5 percent in October, down to 2,226 units sold from 2,765 during the same month in the previous year. The median condominium sale price dropped 4.8 percent to $261,750 from $275,000.”

This does not bode well for homeowners who have been hoping for continued growth in home values, which would in turn, allow them to tap into equity and refinance their way out of adjustable mortgages. It doesn’t sound like that can happen any time soon.

In a press release, Timothy Warren, Jr. , the CEO of the Warren Group had this to say:

“While we expect the market to stabilize sometime in 2007, it appears as though the housing sector is undergoing a significant correction.”

I have no idea what why he expects the housing market will stabilize sometime in 2007. If anyone has a clue, I encourage you to comment.

  • Share/Bookmark

Debt and Insecurity

According to a report in today’s Boston Globe, there’s a “marked increase in the number of troops stripped of their security clearances because they are so deeply in debt.”

The number of soldiers who are losing their clearances because of financial problems has nearly doubled over last year.

  • Share/Bookmark

Bad News and Deja Vu

Interest rates have pushed mortgage payments higher. The softening real estate market has made it difficult for homeowners to sell or refinance. And just in time for the holidays, Boston is increasing its residential tax rates…and for some, the increase is going to hurt even more. From Boston.com:

The annual tax bill for the average single-family house will increase from $2,755 this year to $3,093, starting in January. The estimated bill for the average two-family house will jump from $3,307 to $3,857, while the bill for the average three-family house is expected to increase from $3,725 to $4,309.

Meanwhile, in other news, some argue that the financial crisis facing homeowners is nothing like it was in the early 1990s. The Lowell Sun reports that might not be the case:

Massachusetts homeowners had 4,891 foreclosure actions filed against them during the third quarter of this year, 66 percent higher than the same period in 2005, according to ForeclosuresMass.com, a provider of such data. The most recent data indicates that foreclosure filings are on record pace, higher even than the dark days of 1991.

  • Share/Bookmark

Behind the Foreclosure Numbers

Statistics have been floating around for months (even on this site) about the foreclosure rates throughout the country. However, an article in the Denver Business Journal raises an interesting question: what’s really behind those numbers?

“What’s coming through here is that more people are giving up,” [Lakewood, Colorado Realtor Lance] Chayet said.

What the numbers don’t tell, he added, are whether the sellers who have taken their properties off the market are doing so temporarily until after the holidays or whether sellers are so desperate that they are allowing their homes to go into foreclosure.

Colorado currently leads the country in foreclosure rates. But the article certainly makes me wonder: with Massachusetts foreclosure rates continuing to rise, and the housing market still on a downward slope, could the same thing happen here?

  • Share/Bookmark

Just Plain Wrong

I’ve often commented on the sad tactics debt collectors use to shake down distressed debtors. Fortunately, there’s no prize for the sleaziest tactics. If there were, Alpine Credit Inc. out of Lakewood, Colorado would win a blue ribbon.

A client of my colleague and fellow NACBA member Will Evans received a letter from Alpine that conveyed this delightful message:

“The bench warrant from your arrest will remain in effect until your judgment is satisfied. We are confident, at some point in time you will be pulled over for a traffic violation, will need to renew your drivers license, or will be arrested at your home. You must post a cash bond before you will be released from jail. Your failure to face the seriousness of this matter will only result in further expenses.”

Interestingly, Alpine Credit apparently touts itself as being “professional”, “ethical” and “legal.” For real.

Will tells me that his client was “…in extreme distress because she was afraid to take her kids to school for fear of being pulled over and arrested in front of them.”

At the risk of sounding unprofessional, what kind of desperate little scum-bag bill collector needs to descend to such levels? I can’t imagine it’s ethical, and I know it’s not legal.

Most people would – if they could – pay their bills. The last thing struggling folks need is a letter like this…and the fear and sleepless nights it spawns. A violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act? You bet. But perhaps more importantly: it’s just plain wrong.

  • Share/Bookmark

And in Other Sunday Papers…

The American Bankers Association is telling the Arizona Republic that the new bankruptcy laws (which will have it’s first anniversary on Tuesday, October 17) is working as it was intended. Fortunately, there is more than one source for news. Delaware Online reports that after one year, the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 is not quite doing what bankers had hoped or paid for.

Certainly, bankruptcy attorneys – including yours truly – would agree that there has been a substantial drop in case filings. A Toledo Blade report attributes the drop in filings to higher legal fees and a “difficult” income test. Most bankruptcy attorneys have had to increase their fees since October 17, 2005 due to the increased work on a typical bankruptcy. In many cases, the work has doubled than it was under the old law. However, I am not convinced that the means test is “difficult.” While it’s an extra form, and more paperwork, I cannot say however, it is “difficult.”

What remains difficult is the struggle people face in dealing with debt that’s grown out of control. That difficulty is only intensified when debt collectors get ugly. From the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, this year the Pennsylvania Consumer Protection Bureau has received the highest number of complaints against abusive debt collectors than any other industry, such as telephone companies:

Take the case in which a collection agency telephoned a woman’s 5-year-old daughter, ordering her to tell her deadbeat mommy that she’d better pay her credit card bills.

I have to wonder: did the bill collector also tell the 5-year-old that mommy could not file bankruptcy anymore because it was too expensive and there was a difficult income test? I hope not. Debt collectors are not supposed to lie.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Refinance Reality Check

The Boston Sunday Globe’s Magazine asks this question:

As property values soared, we got hooked on the idea of using our house as a bank, pulling out blocks of equity to pay for renovations, vacations, and more. Now, will the softer real estate market cost some of us our homes, our shirts, even our retirement?

For many Massachusetts homeowners, the short answer is yes.

  • Share/Bookmark

Settlement Offers from Creditors

When my firm is retained to file bankruptcy for clients, our clients refer their creditors and collection calls to our office. When they call, most creditors merely confirm we have been retained, ask us when we can expect to file their bankruptcy petition, and then hang up. But lately, some creditors are asking if our clients would like to “settle” their credit card debts instead of filing bankruptcy. These creditors are not too swift.

Most clients have more than one debt, and many clients have a mortgage (or two). How can settling with one account benefit the client at all?

Perhaps more importantly, such payments might be considered preferential under the bankruptcy code. Payments made to any regular creditors that total $600 or more within the 90 day period prior to filing must be disclosed on the Statement of Financial Affairs. These are considered “preferential” payments.

In bankruptcy, all creditors are treated equally, and if the debtor knew he was in financial distress on the day he filed bankruptcy, chances are he knew it 90 days prior to that. Therefore, any large payment would confirm that the debtor preferred one creditor over another. In those cases, a Chapter 7 Trustee would be entitled to get that payment returned so it can be distributed to the rest of the creditors. So the client is out the money, and the creditor is forced to give turn it over to the Chapter 7 Trustee.

So where’s the motivation for our clients to settle? There is none. Clients get no benefit from settling any debt prior to filing their petition. If anything they are throwing money away that could be used to get them back on the road to financial wellness. The only benefit goes to the rouge credit card company or collection firm that gets the money. And depending on the payment amount, they only have it temporarily.

  • Share/Bookmark

And Speaking Of Credit Counseling Predators…

West Virginia Attorney General Darrell McGraw announced a settlement with Help Ministries Incorporated, d/b/a Debt Free, a credit counseling agency based in Mesa, Arizona. According to a statement released by the AG’s office:

Debt Free’s primary service consisted of arranging monthly payment plans known as “debt management plans” to assist consumers facing dire financial circumstances. West Virginia law caps the allowable fee for administering debt management plans at 7% of the monthly payment amount. However, Debt Free previously charged monthly service fees in excess of 7% as well as a one-time “set-up” fee that was not distributed to creditors. Debt Free also charged several other fees not permitted by West Virginia law, including a monthly fee for funds handling, a fee for “credit education,” and an administrative fee of $20.00 for failed electronic debits.

With these fees, I wonder if Help Ministries is actually helpful to anyone…except themselves.

This is the third settlement with a creditor counseling company/debt agency in 12 months. The WV Attorney General’s office has also entered into settlements with Debt Management Credit Counseling Corp., of Boca Raton, Florida, and Cambridge Counseling Credit Corp. of Agawam, Massachusetts.

  • Share/Bookmark