After reading a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision issued yesterday, I’ve been struggling. There’s an important legal issue to discuss, but at the same time, I’ve been struggling with the title. I wanted to use a title that was little kitschy, because after all, that’s what makes a blog even moderately entertaining and worth visiting. I think. I also thought the issue justified my resorting to something profound. Something that makes the reader go “hmmm…so true.” Then, there’s a part of me that just wants the decision to speak for itself. So here goes.
In July 2001, Robin got a Providian credit card. The terms of the account – on that slip of paper that people have a tendency not to read required that it be governed by New Hampshire law. If you have not heard of Providian, spend some time on the net searching them out. You’ll get the sense that they weren’t a particularly consumer-friendly company, unless your idea of being consumer-friendly is only to pretend to be friendly. But I digress.
She defaulted on the card in November 2001. We don’t know why she defaulted. Don’t know if it was a lost job. A health matter. Don’t know if she was just being irresponsible. We just don’t know and I cannot assume what I do not know (and what’s not discussed in the decision). Her bill was about $3,000 with an interest rate that was high enough to be flirting with 25 percent. The New Hampshire statute of limitations on credit cards is three years.
In December 2004, more than three years later, Robin received a letter from a debt buyer attempting to collect the debt. The debtor buyer than sued her. After that suit was voluntarily dismissed, she sued the debt buyer claiming violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act for attempting to collect a debt that was time-barred.
