Posts Tagged ‘Chapter 7’

Rumor Control: TheStreet.com gets it wrong.

With the limited exception of realizing while in court that I have worn two different colored socks and I am convinced that everyone can tell, there’s nothing that drives me more nuts than exaggerated and half-baked claims about bankruptcy. A recent article on TheStreet.com proves my point. Lauren Tara LaCapra writes in “Bankruptcy Can Hurt For Decades”:

Rules enacted in 2005 made it harder and more costly for Americans to file for Chapter 7, in which assets are liquidated and given to creditors, or Chapter 13, which structures a repayment plan for certain debts over a term up to five years. (Debts outside of the plan would not have to be repaid.)

Harder, no. Costlier, yes. It’s hard to really chide the writer for this lack of understanding because I know many people have it. But, there is also this: “Debtors outside of the plan would not have to be repaid.”

Um….No. If debts are not in the plan, they need to be paid. A best example I can give is with a car loan. If the debtor wants to keep the car, the loan needs to be paid. That loan is paid outside the plan. If it doesn’t get paid, the car gets repossessed. I could (and perhaps will at some point) get into some long analysis as to whether a deficiency must be paid through the plan and why. I could (and perhaps will at some point) blog about what happens when debtors attempt to pay only certain creditors through a plan, while paying others on the side. Suffice it to say, the claim that debts not included in the plan need not be repaid is flat out wrong. (I could reasonably infer that the term “Debts” might really mean “Regular monthly expenses” such as the electric bill and the phone bill. Those do get paid outside the plan…but they are not debts. They are expenses.)

Then, the article refers to an Ohio State University study:

…it can take over 20 years for bankruptcy filers to reach the same financial status as those with similar social and economic backgrounds who did not file for bankruptcy. It took more than a decade for a bankruptcy filer to catch up to peers in terms of savings, income and home ownership, according to the study. It took more than a quarter of a century to reach the same level of net worth.

Translated: people who file bankruptcy will not be in the same financial station in life as their peers who do not file bankruptcy. I imagine that most people facing bankruptcy know this…I also imagine that if they are in so much debt that they probably already know this. I also imagine that some of “their peers” are also quietly suffering with a boat-load of debt while all the while trying to put a good face forward to as not to lead anyone to suspect otherwise.

Jay Zagorsky, co-author of the study and a research scientist at Ohio State, notes that high prices for gas, food and housing, combined with crushing debt, can make bankruptcy seem like an easy way out with a clean slate.

“But,” he adds, “to experience what people may heard of as a ‘fresh start,’ that may take longer than they expect or would like.”

True. But it’s going to be easier to pay the higher costs for food, gas and home heating oil if the other debt is dealt with in bankruptcy. As far as getting credit again, it can happen. I have had clients who have been in bankruptcy (chapter 13) and gotten credit cards (without my knowledge and without court permission…which is actually not a smart thing to do at all). I have had clients who have received their chapter 7 discharge and within weeks were receiving credit card offers (and in some cases, receiving cards). Of course, in those days, if you had a pulse, an address you could get a credit card.

Today, it’s not so easy. We are in a credit crunch. Underwriting standards are changing, and some merchants are rethinking whether they will accept credit cards. Just this week, I received a letter from Filene’s Basement telling me that they were discontinuing their credit card after September 1. They were also kind enough to send me a coupon for 15% off of one-item. But I digress…

Gas and food costs are going to make it difficult for people. Actually, it is making things difficult for people…which includes people like me. Then, the article offers this not-particularly-sage advice:

Those grappling with high costs and excessive debt should seek out other options first — whether restructuring or consolidating debt, negotiating a payment plan or lower interest rates with creditors, selling off assets or simply cutting back on costs — before putting a 20-year “scarlet letter” on their credit scores.

You cannot restructure your mortgage if your lender will not return your calls. You cannot consolidate your debt if you cannot qualify for a consolidation loan. You shouldn’t consider repaying debt with credit counseling without exploring whether chapter 13 is actually a better and more cost effective route. Selling assets: sure. So long as it’s not a house you need to sell anytime soon, and so long as you’re not selling something to a buddy because you’re concerned about losing it in a later bankruptcy filing. And as for cutting back on costs, some cannot cut back anymore.

Finally, the bankruptcy filing does not stay on the credit report for 20 years. It’s on the credit report for 10. It’s also not a Scarlett Letter…harkening back to that Nathaniel Hawthorne novel about an adulterous Demi Moore who is forced to wear an “A” so as to let the world know how sinful she is.

For the overwhelming number of people who walk through my office door, that bankruptcy filing is exactly what they need to move on. The bankruptcy is exactly what it will take to get things back on track and to help them face the new economic challenges that face us all. While I encourage debate with others with different points of view, I urge anyone who is “knee-deep in debt” to get the facts. It’s a shame that this article is short on them.

  • Share/Bookmark

“I Need to Get Through the Winter”

For weeks I have wondered what impact the high price of home heating oil was going to have on people who need it. Would it push them into bankruptcy (or worse)? Since it is usually an accumulation of things that leads one to file bankruptcy, there is no clear way I can predict that the price of oil is going to push people over the financial edge. But last week, I spoke with a client who found himself standing on the proverbial financial precipice, and it was that realization that lead them to think about filing bankruptcy.

The client recently ended a long term relationship. As many of us know, it is far cheaper for two people to live under the same roof than it is for one. The household income had dropped, and every day expenses increased. There was also some debt that continued to linger such as credit cards and consolidation loans. While he was paying a modest rent (less than $1,000 per month), it did not include the price of home heating oil.

To meet his obligations, the client did what many people do: he decreased expenses. However, he did so to the detriment of his health. A few years ago, he underwent a gastric by-pass. Instead of buying the protein and vegetables that his doctor expected him to eat (and that frankly, we all need to eat), he was instead eating the less expensive pasta and starch that he should not be eating.

Since it’s July, his oil use in the summer is limited to heating the hot water, and just ½ tank (100 gallons) can get him through most of the summer. But from December through April, it is not uncommon for his tank to be filled at least once per month. What prompted him to call me was that when he got his summer oil delivery last month, that 100 gallons cost him $429.

Making things more difficult: many (if not all) oil companies are refusing to lock in prices or offer budget plans.

The client realizes that unless the other debt is somehow compromised, he either will not be able to heat his apartment, or his other creditors will not get paid. In other words, he sees that at some point, a choice will need to be made. Without the debt, the client could get through the winter assuming that that there are no dramatic increases in the prices. And it is this scenario that causes me to ponder this: “how many other people are wondering how they are going to do it?”

It’s not an easy question I can answer. However, for this client, who is struggling with the increasing prices on consumer goods and debt, and facing a cold and expensive winter, he has answered that question by considering bankruptcy. For him, it might be the only way to get through the winter.

  • Share/Bookmark

Inaccurate Schedules Lead to Discharge Denial

There is any number of ways that a debtor can get a discharge denied, and certainly, I have blogged about them here. One of the big ones is the most obvious: lying. I came across a recent case out of the Southern District of New York that should serve as a warning to all debtors – and especially to those debtors who think they can file bankruptcy without an experienced bankruptcy attorney. This pro se debtor was a former attorney (his license was suspended). There’s nothing in the record that suggests he was experienced in bankruptcy…but he still should have known better.

The case was filed in August 2006. In his original schedules, the debtor listed his monthly net income as $2,144 and expenses of $2,427. Among the expenses was $500 per month in support for “additional dependants not living” with the debtor. He also did not indicate that he had any student loan obligations, and wrote “0” in the box that specifically asks if the debtor has student loans.

A few days after filing the petition, the debtor amended his schedules showing an increase in his monthly expenses. In this amendment, he claimed that his expenses had increased, and identified a monthly domestic support obligation of $600 (and he identified the creditor to whom he owed the child support). He also stated he spent $20 per month on recreation.

Only 9 days latter, the debtor amended his schedules to identify a new creditor: a phone company who had an unsecured non-priority claim of $190.

In March 2007, the schedules were amended again. This time, the debtor added additional creditors and showed that his income was $2,840 and his expenses were $2,829. His recreation expenses were now $140 per month.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Walking Away from the Mortgage and the Home? Consider this…

Some homeowners are giving up on the thought of keeping their home. There are a number of reasons for this. And if you are among the many homeowners contemplating walking away from their home, and the mortgage debt, you should consider a few things.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Massachusetts Debt Collector Gets Sanctioned by Florida Bankruptcy Court

A Massachusetts debt collector along with the creditor has been sanctioned by the bankruptcy court in Florida for violating the discharge injunction. On April 4, 2007 Olson filed a Chapter 7 petition in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On his schedules, he listed a debt owed to Wells Fargo Financial in the amount of $976. Two separate addresses for Wells Fargo appeared on the creditor matrix. His creditor’s meeting was held on May 3 and on July 3 he received his discharge.

In a letter dated March 10, 2008, Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC in Haverill sent a letter to the debtor demanding payment in the principal amount of $976.71 and with interest, a total balance of $1,353.65. The debt was now purportedly held by North Star Capital Acquisitions. Payment was demanding by the close of business on March 31, 2008. On March 18, 2008, the Debtor moved to report his bankruptcy case, and that motion was allowed on March 31.

On that same date, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Order to Show Cause. The order directed Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC and North Star Capital Acquisition LLC to appear before the court through counsel on April 21, 2008 to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for making a demand for payment on the debtor. The order was mailed to the CEO of North Star at its New York address and at its agent’s address in St. Paul, Minnesota. It was mailed to Nelson, Watson & Associates LLC at its Merrimack Street address in Haverhill (the order reflects the same address that appears on Nelson’s website).

April 21, 2008 came, and no one appeared. This is a problem for two reasons: (1) it’s a court order and when the court orders you to appear before it, you do so and (2) no one got to hear their side of the story. No even a written statement was field. It was as if they played possum.

You can imagine that this displeased the court. On April 28, the court held Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC along with North Stat in contempt of court because they failed to attend the hearing and they violated the discharge injunction. Both were ordered to pay fines in the amount of $2,500. If they did not pay their fines by May 30, the court stated that it would issue a separate order directing the US Marshal to APPREHEND David Paris, CEO of North Star and George Nelson, III, Manager of Nelson, Watson & Associates,LLC for the purpose of “bringing [them] before the Court to explain [their] contemptuous conduct and why further sanctions should not imposed.” They were also ordered to obey the discharge injunction.

On May 6 Nelson paid its find and North Star paid on May 13. The case remains open.

As an aside, it takes less than 30 seconds to determine if someone has filed bankruptcy. Debtor’s attorneys routinely do it as part of their due diligence in preparing bankruptcy petitions. Since there is no response from Nelson, we’re all left wondering: did you check and send the letter anyway? or were you just negligent? Without an explanation, we’ll never really know the truth (but I encourage them to chime in and comment if they get wind of this blog post).

In re Olson, US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida at Fort Lauderdale, 07-12387.

  • Share/Bookmark

8th Circuit: Failure to Stop Abuse is not a Willful Injury

This recent bankruptcy court decision is not an easy one to discuss, and I’ll warn my readers up front, this may not be an easy read. The case posed this question: Can a mother who allowed her child to be abused to the point where it lead to his murder escape the penalties for his wrongful death in bankruptcy? I know what my heart said. I know what yours is probably thinking. And yet the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit has said yes.

Denise was the mother of 3-year old Dillon and a 5-year old daughter. In March of 2001, she and Steven McBride began dating and soon thereafter, she, McBride and the kids moved into a two bedroom apartment. Denise worked at the same daycare center that both children attended, and Dillon also participated in speech therapy programs administered by the local school district.

At some point, McBride began physically abusing Dillon. Since Denise worked at a daycare center, she had received training in identifying and reporting child abuse. She knew that her boyfriend was physically abusing her son. Despite asking him to stop, the abuse persisted and she did nothing to stop it.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Reaffirming Mortgages

When a debtor “reaffirms” the debt, they are removing that debt from the bankruptcy process. They are agreeing to pay the debt, even though it would be otherwise discharged. For the reaffirmation to be enforceable there must be an agreement which must comply with the bankruptcy code and it must be filed and in some cases approved by the bankruptcy court. The most common reaffirmation agreement consumer attorneys deal with concerns automobile loans. Debtors usually want to keep their cars, and a reaffirmation is necessary to ensure that debtors can keep it after the case is filed. In a recent case out of Connecticut, the Bankruptcy Court denied approval of two reaffirmation agreements for debts secured by mortgages the debtor’s residence.

The debtor sought to approve the two reaffirmation agreements. The court held a hearing and found that the reaffirmation agreement did not impose an undue hardship on the debtor and was in the debtor’s best interest. After the hearing, the court vacated its order and raised this issue: does the debtor have the “ride through” option available as it pertains to real estate. In other words, could the debtor just keep the house and pay the mortgage without having to enter into a reaffirmation agreement?

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

High Income Debtor Gets Chapter 7 Relief

There are these nasty rumors being spread around that bankruptcy is no longer available to people. I hear – time and time again – that people think bankruptcy is not available because of the “means test” or because it’s “harder to wipe away debts.” A recent decision out of Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska involving a debtor with a high household income confirms otherwise.

In this case, the married debtor was not joined in the bankruptcy by her husband. The combined annualized “current monthly income” was a bit over $150,000. She believed her home to be worth about $500,000 which was secured by mortgages totaling $410,000. Monthly mortgage payments totaled just under $4,500 per month.

The US Trustee filed a motion to dismiss the case on the basis that the petition was filed in bad faith or “the totality of circumstances …of the debtor’s financial situation demonstrates abuse.” See Bankruptcy Code Section 707(b)(3). The UST argued that the mortgage payment was excessive and unreasonable.

The court noted that there is “no ‘bright line’ rules as to whether a debtor’s income, housing or other expenses are so high that it would be an abuse of the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code to grant Chapter 7 relief.” Even though at first glance, the high income and high mortgage payments (and remember, this is Nebraska), there were other factors that weighed in the debtor’s favor.

Debtor lost her job when the company she worked for was sold. Her current employment was obtained only 6 months prior to filing her petition, and she took a drastic cut in pay (more than 1/3 less). The “bottom line is that this bankruptcy was precipitated by a job loss.” With that said, the court denied the US Trustee’s motion.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

A Lesson in Exemptions

In May 7 decision the First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a debtor was limited to the amount of his stated objections. For those thinking of preparing cases on their own, or for others with perhaps different motives, the case teaches a good lesson: you reap what you sow.

In a chapter 7, all of the debtor’s property becomes property of the estate, and is sold. The proceeds of the sale are used to pay creditors and other administrative expenses. The debtor is permitted to keep property – what are referred to as exemptions. In addition to other documents, debtors are required to file schedule B, which identifies personal property, and schedule C, which sets forth the debtor’s claimed exemptions. The code requires that if any party wants to object to any claimed exemption of the debtor, the party must file an objection within 30 days following the conclusion of the creditors meeting, or Section 341 meeting. If that is not done, the property slips “beyond the estate’s grasp.”

In this case, the debtor listed on Schedule B a total of about $170,000 in money that was owed to him. On Schedule C, he claimed that the claims were only worth $8,000 and were otherwise exempt from the estate. No objection was filed. About a year later, the trustee asked the bankruptcy court to approve a settlement in the amount of $100,000.

The debtor argued that the estate had no interest in the lawsuits at all. But the Bankruptcy Court in Puerto Rico ruled that the debtor had not exempted the lawsuits, but only $4,000 partial interest in each suit. It approved a settlement where the proceeds could be paid to the trustee, with $8,000 paid to the debtor reflecting the amount of their exemption. The US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico affirmed and the debtor appealed.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

This Debtor Knew When to Fold

When people gamble, they can win. But let’s face it: not often. When they lose, they can lose big. When is a gambler entitled to relief under the Bankruptcy Code? While the answer is not entirely black and white, a February 29 decision out of the Northern District Ohio sheds some light on the issue.

The debtor’s gambling habit started just for fun (with no money) but then, money slipped into the games. The money was followed by credit cards. All of this led to a downward spiral during which time the gambling began to consume the debtor’s life. She visited online gambling sites in the morning before going to work, would come home from work at lunch and gamble, and then do it throughout the evening at the end of her work day. At some point, the debtor realized that it was out of control, and she started seeing a counselor.

After she stopped gambling and was seeing her counselor, she cut back on household expenses. She canceled her home internet service and checked emails only from work. However, by this time she had accrued high balances on her credit card accounts.

Rather than run to bankruptcy court, she attempted to investigate various debt consolidation services, but found that the monthly payments would be more than what she could afford.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark