Archive for the ‘Chapter 7’ Category

Honesty and Bankruptcy, Part I: Day of the Living Dishonest

When rapper Chris Brown beat up his then girlfriend Rhianna, there was an odd reaction from much of Hollywood.  As Adam Carolla and Dr. Drew were recently discussing on Carolla’s podcast, Hollywood’s reaction – especially at red carpet events – seemed less than honest and at times downright pathetic.  Some were praising Brown for being a “good person” who was going through a difficult time.  But only a few stood forward and publicly denounced Chris Brown as a pathetic loser who viciously assaulted his girlfriend… something no one can legitimately justify.  The podcast echoed in my mind this week when I was faced with a debtor who was – to put it mildly – outrageously dishonest.  So much so that I was forced to look this person in the eye and say “you know, you’re not coming across as an honest but unfortunate person entitled to bankruptcy protection.”  I thought I was being polite.  Their response left me thinking even more.

I cannot share the details.  Instead, let me share this clever allegory that I believe aptly illustrates exactly how things went in my meeting with this debtor.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

When You Discover that You Are a Creditor in a Bankruptcy Case…

Last week, I was in the clerk’s office and overheard two people ask the clerk which forms needed to be filed in a bankruptcy case.  But this person was not a debtor – they were a creditor.  Their landlord had filed bankruptcy.  The former tenant was looking for their security deposit back, and was going to sue the debtor in small claims.  I couldn’t help myself – and I butted in.

“You need relief from the automatic stay.”

“The stay applies even to me?” one asked.

“It applies to everyone.”

After that short exchange, I thought I would put together a short checklist of things to do when your landlord – or someone else you know who also happens to owe you money – files a petition seeking bankruptcy protection.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Social Networking Sites and Bankruptcy: The Intersection is Dead Ahead

There are a growing number of social networking sites out there on the world-wide-interwebs that people are latching onto.   In fact, both the firm and I have latched onto Facebook (we just lauched our Fan page this week!).  So I was intrigued after recently reading that a growing number of domestic relations attorneys were beginning to scour sites like Facebook in an effort to get information on opposing parties.  At first, I found it merely interesting as I once practiced domestic relations law.  But the subject gnawed on me for several days.   Then, earlier this week, I read that collection agencies are trolling sites like Facebook looking for debtors.  Then it dawned on me: if collectors are doing it, and divorce attorneys are doing it, there really is nothing stopping any party in any legal case from looking into Facebook or other social networking sites in an effort to gain a legal advantage of any opposing party.  And this rings true in the world of bankruptcy.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Elephant in the Room: Married Same-Sex Debtors

The decision to seek bankruptcy protection is never easy, and when two people are involved, it is not necessarily easier.  Married opposite-sex debtors have the option of seeking bankruptcy protection jointly in one case.  But as a growing handful of states recognize same-sex marriages or its legal equivalent (“unions”), and as the legitimacy and constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (or DOMA) continues to be litigated in courts across the country, same-sex debtors seeking bankruptcy relief face even tougher decisions.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Unintended Consequences in Estate Planning

Remember yesterday when I discussed talking to your parents about their debt?  I think it’s important for families to start talking.  I also think it may be important for parents to speak to their adult children about debt, especially when you hear what happened to a client of mine.

My client did not know that his parents had gone to an estate planning attorney.  The parents created a life estate in their home, leaving a remainder interest to their adult children.  The life estate gives the parents the right to live in their home until they die, and then upon their death, the home will pass to the children without having to go through probate. The children have what is called a remainder interest.  They do not have the home, but they have a future interest in the home.

This nifty estate planning tool created havoc when one of the parents’ children (my client) filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy protection.  In chapter 7, the unexempt assets of the debtor are sold to pay creditors.  The debtor did not list the asset because he did not know he had an interest in his parent’s home (neither he nor his then attorney asked).  Since it was not known, it was not listed, and since it was not listed, the debtor did not claim it as exempt from liquidation.

The chapter 7 trustee learned about the interest presumably by scouring public records.  When the trustee got wind of the future interest, he asked the court for permission to sell the interest to the highest bidder.  The Bankruptcy Code allows the trustee too sell the debtor’s interest in the property: something the parents did not plan for when they were putting together their estate plan and trying to preserve their home for all of their children.

I will relay how this saga ended another time.  For now, I will say that it ended up costing the debtor a lot of money, and causing the entire family anxiety that they did not need.  If the debtor had told his parents that he was in debt and needed to file bankruptcy, there still would have been issues to resolve.  However, both the debtor and his parents could have been proactive instead of being reactive.  Rather than reacting to the trustee’s attempts to seek an order of sale, they could have taken some time to think through other options before starting the bankruptcy process. These folks never got to that point because no one in the family really talked to each other about what was going on.  The parents did not mention the estate plan, and the debtor did not mention the bankruptcy, or the reasons why bankruptcy protection was needed.

It’s hard for adult parents to admit to their kids that they have financial problems, and for very different reasons, it’s hard for adult kids to have to admit it to their parents.  But actions have consequences.  And as this debtor, his siblings and his elderly parents learned, not talking about it can also have unintended consequences.  Be proactive, and don’t let this happen to you, your kids, or your parents.  Start talking.

  • Share/Bookmark

Thinking About a Consult?

Today, as I found myself on the phone repeating myself – a lot.  It then occurred to me that I could probably explain how our consult process works here on the website.  In other words, how do you get from reading this website and digesting the information to getting some face-time with a lawyer (i.e., me).

Here’s how.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Sunday News

A fellow bankruptcy attorney shared this article that appeared in last month’s New York Times Magazine.  I see in it some of the same difficulties I see in clients.  It also makes me question how “half-empty” the glass really is.  Although in the interest of full disclosure, the writer has a book coming out.  In other news…

ONE FLAG! Six Flags Amusement Parks files for Chapter 11 protection.

Nashua NH Telegraph:  Welcome to the New Consumer Economy.

Boston Herald:  Consumer spending may never be the same as it was.

South Coast: Home values could take years to recover.  We also could be hitting bottom (I’m not being sarcastic, it says the market “could be a reading a valley”).  I could also be a ledge (ok, that was sarcastic).

Nantucket foreclosures.  I wonder if these homeowners claim their loan was predatory?  I also have to question whether it was.

A bad apple is removed from the barrel: Brockton lawyer settles fraud suit with the Massachusetts Attorney General’s office.

  • Share/Bookmark

Who Really Files Bankruptcy?

What leads a person to the steps of the bankruptcy court seeking relief from debt? That is not an easy question to answer – although there are some out there who may think they know the answer. But as I was digesting a recent opinion out of the Bankruptcy Court in the Northern District of Texas, I read the following:

Anecdotally, this court notes that it sees all sorts of consumer debtors come through the bankruptcy system. At one end of the spectrum, there are individuals who have been plagued with many bad circumstances that have led to their financial demise-such as health problems, injuries, medical bills, job loss or instability, divorce, or death of a bread winner. At the other end of the spectrum, there are individuals who have been blessed with good health and adequate jobs and resources, and yet have somehow created a mountain of consumer debt that they (and probably their creditors) should have known could never be repaid. Some of these latter individuals have even engaged in some sort of fraud along the way-perhaps in a loan application at some point, or with intentional avoidance and nonpayment of taxes, or by hiding assets before entering into bankruptcy.

But the vast majority of debtors this court sees fall somewhere between the two extremes. They are individuals who probably cannot honestly blame “bad luck” as the cause of all of their woes. And many of them have made more poor choices than wise ones, and such choices have finally caught up with them.

So what does this mean, and why am I sharing it with you?  The easiest answer is that it is my experience that the court is right. However, there’s a rather significant “but…”

Unless we’re talking about a nefarious character with no sense of right and wrong, most people do not cheerfully enter the bankruptcy process. By the time they enter bankruptcy, or are at least considering it, they regret decisions they made. They know some of their choices were unwise. However, that does not mean that a debtor is not deserving of a chance to start over.

As I continued to read the Texas decision, I learned that the debtors had inconsistent income, high expenses, and some peculiar explanations for their debt.  Also, the facts seemed to indicate a bit of ambivalence as to how they came into the financial predicament they were in, and why they sought bankruptcy relief. T heir case was dismissed because the court deemed it to be an abuse of Chapter 7. I did not summarize the case because I do not want people to read more into the facts but also because I want to assure readers who are facing bankruptcy that there’s something far more important in this case than the kind of car the debtor was driving or when they bought it.  What’s more important is that they have a sense of who files bankruptcy and who is entitled to the relief afforded by the code.

Far too many talking heads (and readers know who they are) characterize people who file bankruptcy as buffoons with entitlement complexes. Making bad decisions is not evidence of an entitlement complex. Making bad decisions, standing alone, is also not evidence of fraud or other unscrupulous activity.  Making bad decisions is evidence of being human (which by all appearances, some of those talking heads might be similarly viewed as such…although I often wonder).

Of course, whether a decision is so bad that it would effectively rule out bankruptcy as an option can only be determined after a careful review of the facts by someone who knows the law. As this court decision points out, there is no one cause that pushes people into bankruptcy and there is no bright line profile of a person who files bankruptcy. Those that attempt to convince the masses otherwise only breed prejudice and fear where it need not exist.

  • Share/Bookmark

A Holiday Shopping Tip (or Warning)

With Black Friday soon upon us, and the holiday shopping season, I want to get a message out to those folks who are struggling. Perhaps there are folks who know they are going to lose their jobs after the New Year. Perhaps there are folks who have been using credit to get by and now see a bankruptcy petition on the horizon. Perhaps these folks are figuring that they will have one last holiday with really great gifts courtesy of their credit card companies. If you’re reading this, and you’re thinking “wow, he’s totally speaking to me (or about my friend or relative)!” please keep reading.

One thing many consumers do not know is that when you buy “large-ticket” item, it may also come with it a security interest. In other words, that purchase may be a gift, but it may also be collateral. The lender (the store, or the bank that finances the store’s credit cards or credit lines) assumes a security interest. This is something to think about as you’re eyeing that appliance or jewelry. Will it prevent you from filing bankruptcy? Probably not. Will it complicate things? It just might. You may have to pay the debt even if you file bankruptcy or you may have to surrender the collateral. Or you might hear from the creditor months or years after the bankruptcy is over.

Last minute purchases can also get you into hot water. Using a credit card when you have no intention of paying the debt back can be considered fraud. Debts incurred through fraud cannot be discharged. In addition, such actions could be considered bad faith, and might lead to a dismissal or a denial of discharge, depending on the circumstances. What does any of this mean? The short answer is more attorney fees, more anxiety and the possibility that the bankruptcy case will not go as smooth as it otherwise could.

If you’re contemplating bankruptcy, don’t use credit cards for holiday shopping. Speak with an attorney. The last thing any debtor needs is to make a tough situation even worse.

  • Share/Bookmark

Why Bankruptcy Lawyers Require Fees Before Filing

There really is a good reason. And to help prove my point, I turn to an October 2008 decision out of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania: In re Mansfield. In that case, the court was called upon to ask what it viewed as a “deceptively simple question:” may an attorney who charges a “flat fee” for services pursue the uncollected balance due?

In this case, the attorney charged a flat fee for preparing the necessary documents and schedules, but also for attending the first meeting of creditors (which occurs after the case is filed). The fee was paid in one large installment, with the remaining balance divided into smaller installments which were paid or due after the case was filed.

The US Trustee sought a review of the fee practice as well as disgorgement of the fees collected after the case was collected. The attorney claimed there was no authority supporting the relief sought by the US Trustee, and he was entitled to collect at least the value of the services he rendered.

The court did not agree. Under Section 727(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, a “debtor’s obligation under a fee agreement to pay a fixed or flat fee to his attorney for legal services rendered pre- and postpetition in a Chapter 7 case, regardless of how the fee is scheduled to be paid, is a prepetition debt that is dischargeable. The attorney avoided having to return the fees paid because there is a difference of opinion among Bankruptcy Courts throughout the country as to whether the practice of collecting fees post-petition is permissible….and if permissible, the circumstances they are permissible.

In flat fee cases (and it is fair to say most, if not all consumer Chapter 7 cases are flat fee), the court found that the “division of a flat fee arrangement into prepetition and postpetition parts to be conceptually inconsistent and therefore untenable. The Court therefore joins those other courts which hold what when a flat or fixed prepetition agreement is at issue, the fee must be paid in full prior to the commencement of the debtor’s case or the fee is discharged under Section 727(b).”

So in reality, when an attorney requires fees and costs prior to the filing of the petition, it’s because they need to get paid…unlike creditors in a Chapter 7 who in many cases do not get paid at all. There’s case law all over the country that supports it, and other case law that suggests that it can be done. While the current code and the case law leave room for creative argument, debtor’s attorneys can be expected to be wise and take the path of least resistance: earn the fee and serve the client. Certainly, there are bigger battles for debtor’s attorneys to engage in for their clients other than fighting for a fee for postpetition services.

In re Mansfield, US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 08-11648 SR (Ocobter 2, 2008)

  • Share/Bookmark