Archive for the ‘Chapter 13’ Category

How Are You Spending Your MLK Holiday?

January 17 is Martin Luther King Day, but unlike many, I won’t be “off” from work.  I’ll be presenting at and attending the ABI’s Northeast Consumer Winter Conference at Suffolk University Law School in Boston.  I can understand how it might seem disrespectful to be attending a conference on a day when we should be celebrating the life of a civil rights leader.  But it is also, I think, particularly fitting.  Let me explain…

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Light at End of the Tunnel

With the midterm elections over, I am left to wonder: how will the new Congress help struggling Americans who face losing their home.  Will there be better and more streamlined mortgage modification programs?  Will there be a shift in the economic climate that will promote jobs growth?  Will Congress again take up the debate of amending the bankruptcy code to allow owners of single family residences to modify their loans in chapter 13?

I am not optimistic.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Episode 6

The mission: to convince Congress that Section 1322(b)(2) must be amended to allow struggling homeowners to modify the loans securing their principal residences.

The challenge: coming up with ideas no one else has.

The result: hilarity.  Hopefully.

Law and Propaganda 6

  • Share/Bookmark

Episode 5

In this special Halloween episode of Law & Propaganda: Emergency chapter 13s, surgical procedures and other scary things.

Law and Propaganda 5

  • Share/Bookmark

Barney Frank: Please Read This

I have a bone to pick with Barney Frank.  Yesterday, a new multi-million dollar loan program was rolled out by HUD.  Sharing in the local announcements were local Congressmen and other elected officials.

According to a Boston Herald report:

The loan program will provide more than 50,000 loans for unemployed homeowners for up to two years at $20,000 a piece. Advocates noted the funds go toward mortgages that were in good standing before a homeowner became unemployed.

Boston.com reported the program a little differently, but in substance, it’s the same.

To qualify for loans of up to two years, borrowers must have suffered a significant drop in income and be at least three months behind on mortgage payments. They also must demonstrate “a reasonable likelihood of being able to resume” payments within two years.

That smells a bit like “hope.”  So I’m afraid the sound of this program ruffles my feathers a bit.  But what compels me to write is this quote, which also appeared in the same Boston Herald report:

“I cannot think of anybody, beyond anarchism, that would find this an offensive program,” said [Newton Democrat and House Financial Services Committee Chair Barney Frank].

Really?

I’m going on record: Mr. Frank, I’m no anarchist I find this program offensive.  So today, I write this blog to you.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

A Massachusetts Foreclosure Moratorium? Yes, but…

I admit that I have a stick in my craw.  In May 2008, Massachusetts (a non-judicial foreclosure state) imposed a 90 day cooling off period to give time for defaulting home loan borrowers to work with their lenders.  This summer, that period of time got extended to 150 days.  Now, there are calls for a “foreclosure moratorium” in Massachusetts.  I am not a fan of what I think is this inevitability, but before y’all think I’ve really fallen off my rocker, let me give you my perspective, and why I think we need to not just think about the moratorium – but for who and for how long.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Law & Propaganda

So here’s that something new I was Tweeting about: a Podcast.

Law & Propaganda (Episode 1)

  • Share/Bookmark

Mercedes Rule

A rather interesting decision has come out of the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas at Dallas.  The decision is only 4 pages, but in addition to quoting Janis Joplin, it speaks to something that debtors need to hear, that people thinking about bankruptcy need to hear, and that attorneys practicing in bankruptcy court sometimes need to be reminded of.

While the decision follows this blog, I’ve filled in the lines a bit by looking at the public records and bringing in some additional facts.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

20/5 Redux: Things I Won’t Do

In July 2009, I blogged about “Things I Won’t Do” which includes taking what I know will be someone’s last buck to file a bankruptcy case that I know will fail… and there seems to be this level of agnst that I cannot help them.  I’ve received a few calls lately from folks who have not read it.  So I’m posting it again with the reminder that I’m in the business of helping people move forward in their lives. 

Or as I said recently to someone, “I’m a bankruptcy lawyer.  I cannot turn water into wine.”

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

20/5 Redux: Thoughts on When to “Walk Away”

This was first posted in March 2008.  More than two years later, the housing market is still in the pits, and more folks are opting to simply walk away from real estate they can no longer afford.  Little has changed.  And I dare say, it’s getting worse (although those seeking relection this year might want to disagree).  If you own a condo or are in a homeowners association, the 2005 changes to the Bankruptcy Code force you to take some new issues into consideration.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark