So here’s that something new I was Tweeting about: a Podcast.
Archive for the ‘Chapter 11’ Category
Law & Propaganda
Saturday, September 25th, 2010
20/5 Redux: Thoughts on When to “Walk Away”
Thursday, August 26th, 2010
This was first posted in March 2008. More than two years later, the housing market is still in the pits, and more folks are opting to simply walk away from real estate they can no longer afford. Little has changed. And I dare say, it’s getting worse (although those seeking relection this year might want to disagree). If you own a condo or are in a homeowners association, the 2005 changes to the Bankruptcy Code force you to take some new issues into consideration.
Still Think You Can File Bankruptcy Without An Attorney?
Tuesday, July 27th, 2010
Even though I have written and spoken publicly about the perils of representing oneself in bankruptcy, people still do it. I recently came across a case where a lawyer – with a boatload of legal problems – was sanctioned for essentially abandoning his clients during a bankruptcy case. But I’m not writing about that lawyer or what he did that got him into so much hot water with the Bankruptcy Court. Rather, what I write about today is what District of Massachusetts Bankruptcy Judge Melvin Hoffman had to say about the bankruptcy process, and the role of a debtor’s attorney. So if you’re still thinking you can or should go through the bankruptcy process alone, take a few minutes and read this.
Cheap Becomes Expensive
Tuesday, May 18th, 2010
Like many attorneys, I get calls from prospective clients asking me what my fee is for a bankruptcy filing. It’s not a particularly difficult question to answer – in theory. But at the same time, it is. Generally, I know that if their concern is price, then who they retain as their attorney is not all that important to them. But I also get calls from prospective clients who have or had another (and less expensive) attorney who now is not performing at what they believe is an acceptable level. Perhaps they aren’t returning calls. Perhaps they are not giving straight answers to honest questions. Or perhaps better said, the cheap attorney doesn’t know what the hell they are doing. The desire to go cheap has now turned into something expensive. (more…)
The Peculiar Parallel of Debt Relief Agencies and Madonna
Thursday, March 11th, 2010
In yesterday’s blog, I suggested that some attorneys – namely on Craigslist – were not complying with the BAPCPA imposed requirement that they disclose that they are a “debt relief agency.” That might not have been completely fair.
Certainly, when an attorney fits into the definition of a “debt relief agency”, they must disclose that fact and are obligated to comply with additional disclosure requirements. But, if an attorney does not fit into the definition of a “debt relief agency”, may they still represent individuals in consumer bankruptcy matters? The answer is yes… and that raises some interesting questions.
Families Fighting About Debt
Thursday, February 11th, 2010
Lately, I’ve been hearing a lot – and I mean a lot – about the stress that finances (and the lack thereof) is taking on families. I’m hearing about spouses sleeping on couches or in basements. I’m hearing from couples that are fighting and contemplating divorce. And I’m hearing from people who have gone through a divorce because of the household finances and they are trying to find a way to move on.
Today, this blog is for all of those families who find that joy and laughter have been replaced with debt and strife. (more…)
Means Test Not Required in Converted Case
Monday, December 7th, 2009
If you file chapter 7, you need to complete Form 22A, the Statement of Current Monthly Income and Means Test Calculation. But if you file a chapter 13, and then convert the case to chapter 7 are you still obligated to file the Means Test form? A Massachusetts Bankruptcy Judge has ruled on this important issue (In re Guarin, 09-42294 JBR).
What Does a Good Bankruptcy Attorney Do?
Friday, November 27th, 2009
I’ve compared my role as a debtor’s attorney as similar to that of a boy scout. My job is to help my debtor client cross the road without getting hit by the bus. A big part of that job is done while preparing. In essence, I get behind the steering wheel of the bus and I ask myself “if I were trying to run over the debtor, what would I be looking for first?” Perhaps a better, and far less macabre way of looking at how I do my job is this: when preparing my client’s case, I pretend that I am trustee and I ask myself: what has my client told me or shown me that would send up a red flag. What could make my client’s life even more difficult than it already is?
Birds flying high, You know how I feel
Back in September, I blogged about the conflict that exists with the rights of married same gender spouses to file a joint bankruptcy petition, and the conflict posted by what I have no problem calling the politically and legislatively ill-conceived Defense of Marriage Act. I felt then that it was – to get a bit personal here - another betrayal by the Clinton Administration (the first being “Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell”).
And just a few weeks ago, I met with a debtor contemplating bankruptcy who wanted to file a joint bankruptcy petition with his same-sex spouse. I advised him that he had two choices: one, is that he could focus on getting the relief from the debt that he had and work towards getting his discharge and getting on with his life. That meant separate petitions, separate cases, separate docket numbers.
Or the other: he and his husband could hunker down, prepare for a long (and not an altogether inexpensive) legal battle that may – or may not – end up at the U.S. Supreme Court – and he could revel in proving a point (although I can think of few bankruptcy debtors who by the time they arrive at the steps of any US Bankruptcy Court actually feel that they need to prove a point… other than the one that is rather obvious). Ultimately, same sex married couples have not enjoyed the benefit of filing a joint bankruptcy petition because the Defense of Marriage Act precluded such joint filings by same sex spouses.
But today, I’m feeling good. (more…)
Tags: Commentary - Legal, Consumer Rights, Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), Joint Debtors
Posted in Bankruptcy, Chapter 11, Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Consumer Rights | 1 Comment »