A few years ago, someone wrote something somewhere (it wasn’t here – I swear) that if you were the victim of predatory lending, you could get a free house. Actually, I recall someone at a legal seminar (not here in Massachusetts – I swear) suggesting that it could be done… which sent some colleagues of mine into a tizzy thinking they could easily get free houses for people who were preyed upon by bad bankers. If that could be done with such ease, then there would be firms not only doing this work, but we’d be reading billboards declaring their success rates on the sides of highways.
Archive for January, 2010
Saving the Home: Thinking Beyond “Delay and Pray”
The foreclosure numbers don’t lie. According to ForeclosuresMass.com, a total of 478 new foreclosures were filed this week (ending January 29, 2010). Approximately 56 homes slipped into foreclosure every day for the last 60 days. The economy is far from a turn around.
HAMP is not really working – at least in not any meaningful way. Homeowners can expect a “delay and pray” modification or an “extend and pretend.” Taking arrears and putting on the tail end of the note, “delay” (which is a nice way of saying a “balloon” payment), means that for it to be paid off, the value of the property will have to increase (hence, the term “pray”). What seems more accurate is “extend and pretend.” You can extend the terms, such as turning a 30 year note into a 40 year note. Of course, the “pretend” comes into play when you want to “pretend” you want to live in the property, “pretend” that the economy and the housing market will turn around so that you still won’t have to come to the closing table with a checkbook in hand.
HAMP is not the only option available to homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure. There’s HARP, there are short sales and there is the possibility of keeping the home under bankruptcy court protection (either in chapter 13 or 11). While bankruptcy should be one of the last options, I am always surprised at people who quickly dismiss it altogether – especially when it’s the best option available.
Consider this scenario:
State of the Union Decompression: The Whole Mortgage Modification Thing
After taking many months learning and understanding HAMP and how it works (and in many cases doesn’t), and after sitting through (and tweeting through) the President’s State of the Union Speech, I am admittedly still mulling it all over. Some tout the speech as the longest in President Obama’s career. Others are debating the propriety of the Nation’s Chief Executive chastising the Supreme Court in the House Chamber. Yet despite its length, its controversies and its platitudes, the word “foreclosure” was not used once. And that should be incredibly disheartening for any homeowner concerned about losing their home. As an insolvency professional who works with homeowners in financial crisis, it was for me. (more…)
The State of Our Union
Tonight, like many Americans, I’m going to be watching the State of the Union speech. While I have many concerns as a citizen, as a bankruptcy and insolvency professional my concerns continue to be on the economy, and the government’s efforts in moving the country through the current economic mess it is in.
I’m not sensing any real effort from the White House, Capital Hill or even Beacon Hill in giving any meaningful solutions to distressed homeowners. Perhaps better said, all I am hearing is double-speak and mish-mash emanating from our elected officials who talk about programs like HAMP, while at the same time, skirt around the statistics that suggest that the program is an abysmal failure. Remember, Obama says HAMP is for “responsible homeowners” but we don’t really know how the term “responsible homeowner” is actually defined. And in no uncertain terms, what I am hearing from my clients, and what I am hearing from my colleagues all fuels my sense that things are not getting better, and Washington appears impotent to do anything about it.
Since tonight is the State of the Union speech, I’m going to hold off – for now – from telling my readers what my view of where things are and where I think things may be going. I do have some idea of what I think we need to do to make things better. And in the coming days, I’ll be sharing what I and McLeod Law Offices is going to do for our clients…and why. But first, tonight I will listen to what our President has to say.
And I’ll also be tweeting – so be sure and follow me on Twitter.
Facing Bankruptcy with Nagging Regret
I recently met with a bankruptcy client who had a lot of credit card debt, almost no equity in their home, and were unable to meet their obligations.
After getting some information, and assessing their situation, I learned that they had lived in their home for almost 25 years, but in the last 12 years had refinanced their home 3 times. The client told me that in no uncertain terms he would not be contemplating bankruptcy if he was able to refinance their home to pay the credit card debt.
Clearly, that wasn’t going to happen.
But then I started thinking, how does someone who has lived in a home for 25 years in the same home have almost no equity to show for it?
Relearning How To Buy Stuff
When I meet with a debtor who has expressed a desire to file bankruptcy, once of the first things I start discussing is their use of credit. Many times, their use of credit also turns to their relationship with credit. If you’re going to file bankruptcy, you need to stop using credit cards. That seems like a bit of a no-brainer. But recently, I had a conversation that went something like this:
“You cannot use credit cards any more,” I told my client. “You need to start operating on a cash basis.”
I saw my client thinking about this, and then after a momentary pause, I heard this reply:
“But how will I buy food?”
The Stuff You Find on Craig’s List
Sometimes, clients will share with me news bytes and other tit bits that I often share with clients. But today, a job-seeking client shared with me a post they found on Craig’s List that was both funny – and a bit troubling.
