<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking Sites and Bankruptcy: The Intersection is Dead Ahead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcleodlawoffices.com/2009/09/social-networking-sites-and-bankruptcy-the-intersection-is-dead-ahead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcleodlawoffices.com/2009/09/social-networking-sites-and-bankruptcy-the-intersection-is-dead-ahead/</link>
	<description>McLeod Law Offices, Boston, Massachusetts. Consumer Bankruptcy, Business Bankruptcy, Litigation: Bankruptcy, Consumer &#38; Debt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danon</title>
		<link>http://mcleodlawoffices.com/2009/09/social-networking-sites-and-bankruptcy-the-intersection-is-dead-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Danon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcleodlawoffices.com/?p=965#comment-660</guid>
		<description>I am torn about this. On one hand I would speculate that once a debtor makes the decision to go into bankruptcy court they feel defeated and ready to disclose all assets. On the other hand Many Many people feel entitled to their stuff even if they can&#039;t afford it, or find a way to justify hiding their stuff because somehow some way its somebody else&#039;s fault they are bankrupt. I don&#039;t know because I have no experience in any of this, just wondering. 

On another note I do know about, Facebook and many to follow have the ability to change settings and determine groups so that people only see what they want them to. meaning you can set a group of work and friends where only the friends see personal pics and work group only sees work related posts. It is becoming increasingly harder to see anyone&#039;s profile unless you are prompted to become friends. Although, the vast majority do not know how to protect themselves so it still seems like a viable way to gain very good information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am torn about this. On one hand I would speculate that once a debtor makes the decision to go into bankruptcy court they feel defeated and ready to disclose all assets. On the other hand Many Many people feel entitled to their stuff even if they can&#8217;t afford it, or find a way to justify hiding their stuff because somehow some way its somebody else&#8217;s fault they are bankrupt. I don&#8217;t know because I have no experience in any of this, just wondering. </p>
<p>On another note I do know about, Facebook and many to follow have the ability to change settings and determine groups so that people only see what they want them to. meaning you can set a group of work and friends where only the friends see personal pics and work group only sees work related posts. It is becoming increasingly harder to see anyone&#8217;s profile unless you are prompted to become friends. Although, the vast majority do not know how to protect themselves so it still seems like a viable way to gain very good information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
