Archive for January, 2009

As the Economy Turns…

Today, my Bankruptcy Colleague and fellow-blogger Jonathan Ginsberg wrote about The Psychology of Debt Collection: Avoid the Manipulation.

The Boston Globe reports that the Massachusetts Attorney General has filed a bill to slow down foreclosures. But the legislation would only protect those in “risky” loans. And if people keep losing their jobs, homeowners with “risky” loans will not be the only ones facing the possibility of losing their home.

Meanwhile, in Washington, a bill that would let some homeowners in Chapter 13 modify the mortgage on their principal residence has cleared the House Judiciary Committee.

While homeowners might be getting a break, recent graduates are finding it tougher and tougher to pay off student loans. An opinion piece in the Minneapolis Star Tribune suggests that a good way to stimulate the economy may be to forgive student loan debt.

The Federal Reserve however, seems to have another idea, although I am not convinced it’s a better idea. From CNNMoney.com:

The Federal Reserve is getting ready to launch a new program that should make it easier for consumers to get credit-card and auto loans — though not necessarily at lower interest rates.

Yikes.

  • Share/Bookmark

Another Foreclosure Workshop Planned

From the Boston Globe:

The Federal Reserve Bank will sponsor a second workshop aimed at preventing foreclosures by bringing borrowers and lenders together to find alternatives.

The workshop, scheduled for February 14 at the Connecticut Convention Center in Hartford, is modeled after a successful event held at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough in August. More than 2,200 borrowers met face-to-face with lender representatives, and about 35 percent of borrowers received loan modifications or workout offers, according to the Boston Fed.

Remember the Gillette workshop? I remember hearing that people were walking away feeling a bit disgruntled. One client told me that he saw people waiting for hours and never spoke with their lender. I also remember hearing later on that mortgages were not getting modified in any meaningful way.

There’s more about this upcoming event here.

If you’re thinking about going to this event, contact us. We have access to tools that may lead you to a more affordable housing payment, and we might be able to save you the trip to Hartford.

In related news from Bloomberg:

The Federal Reserve will ease terms on residential mortgages acquired in the rescues of Bear Stearns Cos. and American International Group Inc., seeking to stem foreclosures.

The Fed policy is targeting borrowers who are 60 days or more overdue on loan payments and covers modifications of interest rates and payment plans. The program uses the Fed’s authority in the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program and was released today by the House Financial Services Committee.

“It reflects the understandable desire of the Federal Reserve to have some cooperation” with the Obama administration, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank told reporters today in Washington. “This is a very big deal.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Monday’s News…

There’s so much going on in the news that it almost seems silly to repost it here. But I did come across a few items that I wanted to share.

In the UK, Debt Collectors are “getting heavy.”

A plan to let homeowners modify their mortgages in bankruptcy may lower foreclosure rates by as much as 20 percent.

Not everyone supports changing the bankruptcy laws to help homeowners modify their loans and plenty of groups are paying lobbyists to kill that bankruptcy legislation. The AP reports who is paying and how much.

  • Share/Bookmark

Before Foreclosure Rescue Scammers Start Knocking…

I came across an interesting story (and video) over at CNBC.com: Fraud at your Front Door which discusses foreclosure rescue scam artists who are knocking at the front door of homeowners facing foreclosure. I have met clients who have told me they have been approached by individuals how have been at their doors offering assistance. But there’s no rescue. They’s only a rip-off.

Not only do the homeowners lose money, they lose time to productively work with their lender. I heard a lender attorney recently say that homeowners have told them that “…we paid this person to help us.” But the person is not helping them, and as this CNBC story points out, in many cases, the “helper” doesn’t even contact the lender. In addition to losing valuable time and money, the homeowner may also lose credibility with the lender.

The story recommends that if your lender is unwilling to relax the payments to help you, seek a qualified real estate attorney or non-profit credit counselor. But there are also local mortgage counselors who will help you with a modification request (click here for ESAC located in Boston). And I also think you should not rule out speaking to a bankruptcy attorney so you can discuss your options. Or, I encourage you to contact us if your lender is unwilling to work with you.

  • Share/Bookmark

Student Loans: The Financial Shackles of Higher Education

Debtors with student loans have an often insurmountable burden in proving their loans are dischargeable in bankruptcy. Section 523(a)(8) requires them to show that the loans are an undue hardship and an example of how the definition of “undue hardship” lacks any common sense can be found here. Lately, many bankruptcy attorneys I have spoken to have admitted that they question the disparity in the treatment that debtors with high mortgage debt receive versus those with high student loan debt.

In its February 2, 2009 issue, Forbes looks at the issue of what it calls “The Great College Loan Hoax.”

Census figures show that college grads earn an average of $57,500 a year, which is 82% more than the $31,600 high school alumni make. Multiply the $25,900 difference by the 40 years the average person works and, sure enough, it comes to a tad over $1 million.

But anybody who has gotten a passing grade in statistics knows what’s wrong with this line of argument. A correlation between B.A.s and incomes is not proof of cause and effect. It may reflect nothing more than the fact that the economy rewards smart people and smart people are likely to go to college. To cite the extreme and obvious example: Bill Gates is rich because he knows how to run a business, not because he matriculated at Harvard. Finishing his degree wouldn’t have increased his income.

This (along with the rest of the article) is a refreshing read. I expect in the months and years to come, there will be more discussions over the trend of forcing students into a debt that is nearly impossible to shed (or for that matter, pay) while dangling the carrot of an education and with that, the promise of a better life.

According to the article, the average law school graduate will emerge with over $100,000 in student loan debt. Based on discussions with law students I have met, I do not believe that it is an inaccurate assessment. Law firms are laying off. The economy continues to sour. Jobs will be scarce – and I am meeting more and more recent graduates who find themselves forced (much like I did almost 18 years ago) to hang up a shingle and establish a practice. However, those realities will not be considered an undue hardship.

I’ll put it this way: it’s far easier to walk away (in any chapter of bankruptcy) from a few properties, a few mortgages, and hundreds of thousands of dollars or more in obligations, than it is to walk away from student loan debt. Yet the unlucky, unwise or unfortunate real estate investor likely has the benefit of the societal safety net that bankruptcy offers. It seems that there is less risk to entering into an “exotic mortgage” than to get a degree in a subject area that might – or might not – have a job waiting for me after graduation. Something doesn’t seem right about that.

  • Share/Bookmark

So You Think It’s a Good Time to Buy a House?

Contrary to what you may hear in advertisements, 2009 may not be a good time to buy a home unless you are planning on living there for several years. This bit of news is not actually a huge shock for me, but it is not helpful for several of my clients whose success depends – at the very least – on people buying real estate in 2009.

This is again, another reason why we need meaningful reform out of Washington soon. Undoubtedly, the proposed changes to the Bankruptcy Code which would allow judges to reduce mortgages of consumers could help. But some contend that the reform will accelerate “lenders’ losses on home-equity, automobile and credit-card loans.” I’m not so that is a particularly bad thing.

About 10 years ago, I had abdominal surgery. As luck would have it, one of the sutures that was designed to dissolve didn’t. Instead, it got infected. It was very painful.

Admittedly, I’m a big baby when it comes to pain (my staff will back that up). This pain was far too much to handle….so my friend put me into a cab and we went to the emergency room. When the doctor came in, he examined the incision, looked at me square in the eye and offered these words:

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Mortgage Modification Legislation Update: Citigroup Supports the Bill

Big news out of Washington, from the Washington Post:

Financial giant Citigroup Inc has agreed to support a controversial rewrite of U.S. bankruptcy law aimed at helping troubled mortgage borrowers, three Democratic senators said on Thursday.

Senators Richard Durbin of Illinois, Charles Schumer of New York and Christopher Dodd of Connecticut said the legal reform would help “millions of families save their homes.”

Citigroup has agreed to support, under certain conditions, a rewrite of bankruptcy law. Under the change, known as “cramdown,” bankruptcy courts could alter the terms of mortgages, subject to certain conditions, the senators said.

More here

  • Share/Bookmark

Keep the Bankruptcy Option on the Table

The new Congress will be introducing legislation that will allow homeowners in bankruptcy to “cram down” their mortgages on their principal residences. When a home is worth less than the amount owed on the mortgage (or as I typically see, mortgages), a cram down will enable the homeowner to reduce the amount owed to the value of the property. Currently, debtors can only do this on investment property, and on property that is not solely the primary residence of the debtor (i.e., a multi-family dwelling).

From a Reuters report:

Courts can generally cut through complex mortgage contracts more aggressively than the private sector, said Wade Henderson, head of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, who has testified before Congress on the issue.

“The continued erosion of the housing market has probably made adopting this proposal inevitable,” he said.

I also invite readers to check out Calculated Risk, and Tanta’s discussions on cram downs. You’ll find those links here.

The final version of what the new President will sign remains to be seen. However, any homeowner facing foreclosure should start exploring whether bankruptcy is an option now and plan ahead (and if you’re in bankruptcy, you should consider speaking with your attorney about whatever options you may have). I know that no one wants to file bankruptcy. But if it comes down to whether you can actually keep your home, you would be foolish to not keep all of your options on the table, including the option to file for bankruptcy protection.

  • Share/Bookmark