Archive for July, 2008

Rumor Control: TheStreet.com gets it wrong.

With the limited exception of realizing while in court that I have worn two different colored socks and I am convinced that everyone can tell, there’s nothing that drives me more nuts than exaggerated and half-baked claims about bankruptcy. A recent article on TheStreet.com proves my point. Lauren Tara LaCapra writes in “Bankruptcy Can Hurt For Decades”:

Rules enacted in 2005 made it harder and more costly for Americans to file for Chapter 7, in which assets are liquidated and given to creditors, or Chapter 13, which structures a repayment plan for certain debts over a term up to five years. (Debts outside of the plan would not have to be repaid.)

Harder, no. Costlier, yes. It’s hard to really chide the writer for this lack of understanding because I know many people have it. But, there is also this: “Debtors outside of the plan would not have to be repaid.”

Um….No. If debts are not in the plan, they need to be paid. A best example I can give is with a car loan. If the debtor wants to keep the car, the loan needs to be paid. That loan is paid outside the plan. If it doesn’t get paid, the car gets repossessed. I could (and perhaps will at some point) get into some long analysis as to whether a deficiency must be paid through the plan and why. I could (and perhaps will at some point) blog about what happens when debtors attempt to pay only certain creditors through a plan, while paying others on the side. Suffice it to say, the claim that debts not included in the plan need not be repaid is flat out wrong. (I could reasonably infer that the term “Debts” might really mean “Regular monthly expenses” such as the electric bill and the phone bill. Those do get paid outside the plan…but they are not debts. They are expenses.)

Then, the article refers to an Ohio State University study:

…it can take over 20 years for bankruptcy filers to reach the same financial status as those with similar social and economic backgrounds who did not file for bankruptcy. It took more than a decade for a bankruptcy filer to catch up to peers in terms of savings, income and home ownership, according to the study. It took more than a quarter of a century to reach the same level of net worth.

Translated: people who file bankruptcy will not be in the same financial station in life as their peers who do not file bankruptcy. I imagine that most people facing bankruptcy know this…I also imagine that if they are in so much debt that they probably already know this. I also imagine that some of “their peers” are also quietly suffering with a boat-load of debt while all the while trying to put a good face forward to as not to lead anyone to suspect otherwise.

Jay Zagorsky, co-author of the study and a research scientist at Ohio State, notes that high prices for gas, food and housing, combined with crushing debt, can make bankruptcy seem like an easy way out with a clean slate.

“But,” he adds, “to experience what people may heard of as a ‘fresh start,’ that may take longer than they expect or would like.”

True. But it’s going to be easier to pay the higher costs for food, gas and home heating oil if the other debt is dealt with in bankruptcy. As far as getting credit again, it can happen. I have had clients who have been in bankruptcy (chapter 13) and gotten credit cards (without my knowledge and without court permission…which is actually not a smart thing to do at all). I have had clients who have received their chapter 7 discharge and within weeks were receiving credit card offers (and in some cases, receiving cards). Of course, in those days, if you had a pulse, an address you could get a credit card.

Today, it’s not so easy. We are in a credit crunch. Underwriting standards are changing, and some merchants are rethinking whether they will accept credit cards. Just this week, I received a letter from Filene’s Basement telling me that they were discontinuing their credit card after September 1. They were also kind enough to send me a coupon for 15% off of one-item. But I digress…

Gas and food costs are going to make it difficult for people. Actually, it is making things difficult for people…which includes people like me. Then, the article offers this not-particularly-sage advice:

Those grappling with high costs and excessive debt should seek out other options first — whether restructuring or consolidating debt, negotiating a payment plan or lower interest rates with creditors, selling off assets or simply cutting back on costs — before putting a 20-year “scarlet letter” on their credit scores.

You cannot restructure your mortgage if your lender will not return your calls. You cannot consolidate your debt if you cannot qualify for a consolidation loan. You shouldn’t consider repaying debt with credit counseling without exploring whether chapter 13 is actually a better and more cost effective route. Selling assets: sure. So long as it’s not a house you need to sell anytime soon, and so long as you’re not selling something to a buddy because you’re concerned about losing it in a later bankruptcy filing. And as for cutting back on costs, some cannot cut back anymore.

Finally, the bankruptcy filing does not stay on the credit report for 20 years. It’s on the credit report for 10. It’s also not a Scarlett Letter…harkening back to that Nathaniel Hawthorne novel about an adulterous Demi Moore who is forced to wear an “A” so as to let the world know how sinful she is.

For the overwhelming number of people who walk through my office door, that bankruptcy filing is exactly what they need to move on. The bankruptcy is exactly what it will take to get things back on track and to help them face the new economic challenges that face us all. While I encourage debate with others with different points of view, I urge anyone who is “knee-deep in debt” to get the facts. It’s a shame that this article is short on them.

  • Share/Bookmark

Charge (not so) Smart

Housing Wire reports that there is a new company that will allow consumers to use their credit cards to pay their mortgage payments.

“Our offering is perfect for the individual who may experience an unexpected lifestyle change such as a temporary income interruption or fluctuation,” said Mitch Friedman, co-founder of ChargeSmart, “or for the savvy consumer who wants to earn rewards for the ease of using his or her credit card for payment.”

Experience an unexpected lifestyle change such as a temporary income fluctuation? Perhaps for someone who just got fired but will land on their feet by the time the next month’s mortgage payment is due, but seems a bit unlikely. This has “bad idea” written all over it, and I’m not alone:

A source at a credit counseling agency that asked not to be named in this story said such a service could possibly work well for some troubled borrowers, provided that “using the charge card is only a temporary bridge into a more complete debt management program that doesn’t rely on consumer credit.”

“But using a service like this to shift unpaid debts around can be a very dangerous move,” she cautioned. “It can pile more debt up over existing debt.”

Others scoffed at the idea, and said ChargeSmart was merely looking to take advantage of borrowers facing their last rope.

“You can’t tell me that a good credit risk is going to pay 2 or more percent for the privilege of putting their mortgage onto their Visa,” said one bank executive, who asked not to be identified. “This is a service that is going to pull in troubled borrowers looking to make just one more mortgage payment before defaulting on both secured and unsecured debts.”

It might also help feed the denial I have written about. ChargeSmart seems like anything but that. If you think you need to use a credit card to make a mortgage payment, it’s time to rethink your financial strategies. And frankly, it may be time to start thinking about contacting me.

  • Share/Bookmark

“I Need to Get Through the Winter”

For weeks I have wondered what impact the high price of home heating oil was going to have on people who need it. Would it push them into bankruptcy (or worse)? Since it is usually an accumulation of things that leads one to file bankruptcy, there is no clear way I can predict that the price of oil is going to push people over the financial edge. But last week, I spoke with a client who found himself standing on the proverbial financial precipice, and it was that realization that lead them to think about filing bankruptcy.

The client recently ended a long term relationship. As many of us know, it is far cheaper for two people to live under the same roof than it is for one. The household income had dropped, and every day expenses increased. There was also some debt that continued to linger such as credit cards and consolidation loans. While he was paying a modest rent (less than $1,000 per month), it did not include the price of home heating oil.

To meet his obligations, the client did what many people do: he decreased expenses. However, he did so to the detriment of his health. A few years ago, he underwent a gastric by-pass. Instead of buying the protein and vegetables that his doctor expected him to eat (and that frankly, we all need to eat), he was instead eating the less expensive pasta and starch that he should not be eating.

Since it’s July, his oil use in the summer is limited to heating the hot water, and just ½ tank (100 gallons) can get him through most of the summer. But from December through April, it is not uncommon for his tank to be filled at least once per month. What prompted him to call me was that when he got his summer oil delivery last month, that 100 gallons cost him $429.

Making things more difficult: many (if not all) oil companies are refusing to lock in prices or offer budget plans.

The client realizes that unless the other debt is somehow compromised, he either will not be able to heat his apartment, or his other creditors will not get paid. In other words, he sees that at some point, a choice will need to be made. Without the debt, the client could get through the winter assuming that that there are no dramatic increases in the prices. And it is this scenario that causes me to ponder this: “how many other people are wondering how they are going to do it?”

It’s not an easy question I can answer. However, for this client, who is struggling with the increasing prices on consumer goods and debt, and facing a cold and expensive winter, he has answered that question by considering bankruptcy. For him, it might be the only way to get through the winter.

  • Share/Bookmark

In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —- That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. —- Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Inaccurate Schedules Lead to Discharge Denial

There is any number of ways that a debtor can get a discharge denied, and certainly, I have blogged about them here. One of the big ones is the most obvious: lying. I came across a recent case out of the Southern District of New York that should serve as a warning to all debtors – and especially to those debtors who think they can file bankruptcy without an experienced bankruptcy attorney. This pro se debtor was a former attorney (his license was suspended). There’s nothing in the record that suggests he was experienced in bankruptcy…but he still should have known better.

The case was filed in August 2006. In his original schedules, the debtor listed his monthly net income as $2,144 and expenses of $2,427. Among the expenses was $500 per month in support for “additional dependants not living” with the debtor. He also did not indicate that he had any student loan obligations, and wrote “0” in the box that specifically asks if the debtor has student loans.

A few days after filing the petition, the debtor amended his schedules showing an increase in his monthly expenses. In this amendment, he claimed that his expenses had increased, and identified a monthly domestic support obligation of $600 (and he identified the creditor to whom he owed the child support). He also stated he spent $20 per month on recreation.

Only 9 days latter, the debtor amended his schedules to identify a new creditor: a phone company who had an unsecured non-priority claim of $190.

In March 2007, the schedules were amended again. This time, the debtor added additional creditors and showed that his income was $2,840 and his expenses were $2,829. His recreation expenses were now $140 per month.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Storm Preparation

As I write this, there is loud thunder clapping outside. I did not bring an umbrella to work. Obviously, I am not prepared today.

And unfortunately, I’m too busy to put together a respectable Storm Preparation blog today. So I’m going to take a short break from that for both this week and next. I’ll still have case updates and news.

Enjoy your holiday!

  • Share/Bookmark

The 401(k) in Chapter 13

In a recent decision, a Massachusetts Bankruptcy Judge ruled that a Chapter 13 debtor may deduct contributions to a 401(k) retirement plan while in bankruptcy. It’s a ruling anyone contemplating chapter 13 should pay attention to.

The debtor’s schedules listed his gross income as $9,666.67 per month. After taxes, insurance and 401(k) contribution of $966.66, that left $5,604.67. The debtor’s plan proposed to pay unsecured creditors a total of approximately 49% over the 60 month span of the plan. The trustee raised a number of issues (many of which are not germane to the topic here), including the propriety of the debtor’s 401(k) deductions.

The trustee argued that such large deductions into the 401(k) demonstrated a lack of the debtor’s good faith. The deductions amounted to 10% of the debtor’s gross income. If debtor stopped the high 401(k) deductions, the debtors would receive a 100% distribution over the life of the plan.

Under Section 541(b)(7), a debtor’s 401(k) contributions are not considered property of the bankruptcy estate. In addition, those amounts withheld are not considered “disposable income” as is defined by Section 1325(b)(2). In overruling the trustee’s objections, the Court noted that the debtor was only “taking advantage of what the law allows.”

Some might argue that this makes no sense: the debtor can pay off only half of what he owes his creditors, while at the same time, setting aside more than $50,000 over the life of the chapter 13 plan. It’s hard to imagine that the folks at MBNA had that in mind when they were lobbying Congress to change the bankruptcy laws. Yet the Court noted, this is exactly what Congress intended: “by excluding 401(k) contributions from property of the estate and expressly removing them from the definition of disposable income under Section 1325(b)…Congress has implemented a policy of protecting and encouraging retirement savings.”

Good faith is still the rule to play by. Future chapter 13 debtors who contribute to a retirement plan may not enjoy the same result if their contributions exceed the limits permitted by their 401(k) plans. But for those folks I meet with who tell me “all of my income goes to my bills, and I have nothing in my retirement account”, this should be welcome news.

In re Mati, Bankr.D.Mass, Chapter 13 case no. 07-13323

  • Share/Bookmark