Archive for June, 2008

8th Circuit: Failure to Stop Abuse is not a Willful Injury

This recent bankruptcy court decision is not an easy one to discuss, and I’ll warn my readers up front, this may not be an easy read. The case posed this question: Can a mother who allowed her child to be abused to the point where it lead to his murder escape the penalties for his wrongful death in bankruptcy? I know what my heart said. I know what yours is probably thinking. And yet the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit has said yes.

Denise was the mother of 3-year old Dillon and a 5-year old daughter. In March of 2001, she and Steven McBride began dating and soon thereafter, she, McBride and the kids moved into a two bedroom apartment. Denise worked at the same daycare center that both children attended, and Dillon also participated in speech therapy programs administered by the local school district.

At some point, McBride began physically abusing Dillon. Since Denise worked at a daycare center, she had received training in identifying and reporting child abuse. She knew that her boyfriend was physically abusing her son. Despite asking him to stop, the abuse persisted and she did nothing to stop it.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Reaffirming Mortgages

When a debtor “reaffirms” the debt, they are removing that debt from the bankruptcy process. They are agreeing to pay the debt, even though it would be otherwise discharged. For the reaffirmation to be enforceable there must be an agreement which must comply with the bankruptcy code and it must be filed and in some cases approved by the bankruptcy court. The most common reaffirmation agreement consumer attorneys deal with concerns automobile loans. Debtors usually want to keep their cars, and a reaffirmation is necessary to ensure that debtors can keep it after the case is filed. In a recent case out of Connecticut, the Bankruptcy Court denied approval of two reaffirmation agreements for debts secured by mortgages the debtor’s residence.

The debtor sought to approve the two reaffirmation agreements. The court held a hearing and found that the reaffirmation agreement did not impose an undue hardship on the debtor and was in the debtor’s best interest. After the hearing, the court vacated its order and raised this issue: does the debtor have the “ride through” option available as it pertains to real estate. In other words, could the debtor just keep the house and pay the mortgage without having to enter into a reaffirmation agreement?

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

High Income Debtor Gets Chapter 7 Relief

There are these nasty rumors being spread around that bankruptcy is no longer available to people. I hear – time and time again – that people think bankruptcy is not available because of the “means test” or because it’s “harder to wipe away debts.” A recent decision out of Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska involving a debtor with a high household income confirms otherwise.

In this case, the married debtor was not joined in the bankruptcy by her husband. The combined annualized “current monthly income” was a bit over $150,000. She believed her home to be worth about $500,000 which was secured by mortgages totaling $410,000. Monthly mortgage payments totaled just under $4,500 per month.

The US Trustee filed a motion to dismiss the case on the basis that the petition was filed in bad faith or “the totality of circumstances …of the debtor’s financial situation demonstrates abuse.” See Bankruptcy Code Section 707(b)(3). The UST argued that the mortgage payment was excessive and unreasonable.

The court noted that there is “no ‘bright line’ rules as to whether a debtor’s income, housing or other expenses are so high that it would be an abuse of the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code to grant Chapter 7 relief.” Even though at first glance, the high income and high mortgage payments (and remember, this is Nebraska), there were other factors that weighed in the debtor’s favor.

Debtor lost her job when the company she worked for was sold. Her current employment was obtained only 6 months prior to filing her petition, and she took a drastic cut in pay (more than 1/3 less). The “bottom line is that this bankruptcy was precipitated by a job loss.” With that said, the court denied the US Trustee’s motion.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Storm Preparation: Bargaining

Of the five stages of the Kubler-Ross Model that people facing bankruptcy go through, the most potentially problematic is the third stage: bargaining. I suggest that this stage might invite the most problems because it is here that debtors do anything and everything to avoid bankruptcy. In doing so, they sometimes end up in an even worse position.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Mass AG Sues Option One

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley’s office has brought suit against Option One. From the press release:

Today, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley’s Office filed a lawsuit in Suffolk Superior Court against Option One Mortgage Corp. (“Option One”), a subprime lender that originated thousands of loans in Massachusetts, and its parent company, H&R Block, Inc. (“H&R Block”). The complaint alleges that Option One and H&R Block engaged in unfair and deceptive conduct on a broad scale by selling extremely risky loan products that the companies knew or should have known were destined to fail to Massachusetts consumers. The complaint also alleges that the companies discriminated against black and Latino borrowers in Massachusetts by charging them higher points and fees to close their loans than similarly situated white borrowers and by targeting black and Latino consumers with marketing that pushed the sale of predatory loan products.

Read more here

  • Share/Bookmark