Archive for May, 2008

Storm Preparation: Stop Using Credit

By the time many people contact a bankruptcy attorney, their credit card balances are already high – if not at their limit. Sometimes, when there is room to spare on the balance, it can be tempting to use credit if a bankruptcy filing is down the road. Here’s a bit of advice: don’t.

Let’s start with the practical view: if you know you will be filing bankruptcy in the future, then you know you will not pay back what you borrowed (or perhaps not all of it at the terms you agreed to). While understandably, you might think that the big bad bankers have it coming to them, it still does not change the fact that it is wrong to take money under the pretense of borrowing, when you know you have no intention of paying it back. And there are legal consequences as well.

Section 523 (a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code precludes discharge of debts that were incurred by fraud. If the charge was incurred during a certain period of time prior to the bankruptcy filing, the debt may be presumed fraudulent. In other words, it’s up to the debtor to prove that it’s dischargeable. If a debt is incurred outside that presumptive period, a creditor may still challenge dischargeability if the facts warrant it. They will have the burden of proof, but the debtor will still need to defend his or her decisions. This is all done through an Adversary Proceeding. And there are consequences with that as well.

Adversary Proceedings are civil lawsuits within the bankruptcy case itself, and it is the procedural mechanism that creditors use to litigate dischargeability issues. They can be complex, long and in some cases, the end result is not all together predictable. It can delay the closure of the bankruptcy. I have seen it cause great consternation and anxiety with debtors. One debtor recently told me that she has not slept well since her Adversary Proceeding started. In addition to all that, the Adversary Proceeding adds to the costs of the case – sometimes substantially. All around, it’s not a good time.

If you see bankruptcy in the future, think twice before using that credit card. Think twice before asking for that personal loan. Think twice before accepting that preapproved offer of credit. Yes, the extra money might bring a temporary fix. However, if you find yourself in bankruptcy court, that decision could be costly. If you find yourself itching to use that credit card, and knowing you cannot pay it back, it’s time to talk to a bankruptcy attorney.

Storm Preparation is a weekly series appearing on Wednesdays and offers tips and information to people who think they may need bankruptcy protection in the future. Questions, comments or suggestions can be addressed to info@mcleodlawoffices.com.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Case of The Dream Pool

I recently read a bankruptcy court decision concerning a very serious matter: nondischargeability of a debt. While serious, there was also a bit of humor in it. The facts of this case were just too good not to share.

The Plaintiffs were homeowners who wanted to have a swimming pool. They lived in Texas, which I hear can get quite warm. The Plaintiffs presumably considered a number of pools before resting on what we can probably infer was the swimming pool of their dreams: “an in-ground swimming pool (with water fall and cave area), space, spa therapy chair, fire pit, covered patio, and outdoor kitchen.” It sounds sweet! In addition to the “drainage and irrigation work” they also wanted to install a rock façade on their home. In November of 2004, they hired the (soon to be) debtor for an agreed price of $100,000, and gave him a $250 deposit.

Apparently, the Plaintiffs were impressed with the (then soon to be) debtor because he “seemed serious about directly managing the project, with on-site supervision, until all work by the subcontractors was completed.” Work on the project began in January of 2005 and shortly after the excavation work, the plaintiff gave the (then soon to be) debtor a check for $40,000. About a week later, the Plaintiffs paid another $40,000 towards the contract price.

Plaintiffs were starting to get concerned about things and they drove out to the (soon to be) debtor’s shop. There, they were told he was not in the office. They were told he was on the lake “with his new boat.” They were told he purchased the boat within three weeks of receiving the $40,000 check. This news was followed by weeks and months of phone calls not being returned.

The pool man then became a debtor in bankruptcy. Plaintiffs’ brought an adversary proceeding claiming that the debt was nondischargeable and it eventually went to trial.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Pro Se Perils: No Ticket and No Excuse

There seem to be debtors everywhere who think they can file bankruptcy without an attorney. Of course, in many, many cases, debtors only end up causing themselves greater problems. A case out of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania proves my point.

The debtor in that case got his case dismissed because he did not received the requisite credit counseling. The case was filed on Valentines Day of this year, and along with his petition, the debtor filed a statement of “Exigent Circumstances” to excuse his failure to comply with the credit counseling requirement. The debtor represented that he was facing a foreclosure sale.

On February 20, the court ordered him to file by the 29th a Supplement to the Certification to enable the court to determine whether the requirements of Section 109(h)(3) had been satisfied. Debtor didn’t. Instead, the debtor filed his Certificate of Credit Counseling on the 28th. The case was dismissed. Debtor filed a motion for reconsideration.

Bankruptcy Code Section 109(h)(3) has at least requirements for establishing that there are Exigent Circumstances justifying a failure to obtain prepetition credit counseling. First, there must be some emergency compelling the filing before the counseling was obtained. Second, the debtor has to have tried to obtain credit counseling before filing the case but was unable to get it within the 5 day period prior to filing. The pro se debtor did not provide any information on this second requirement.

The case got dismissed. Hopefully, when the debtor again files bankruptcy (since he was facing foreclosure, I am assuming he did or will), he will have a lawyer. One of the first things he’ll have to do is seek an extension of the automatic stay because he will then be a repeat filer.

In re Kaufman, No. 08-11087 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.)

You might have missed:

Pro Se Perils: When a Case Gets Dismissed
No Ticket? No Bankruptcy

  • Share/Bookmark