Archive for March, 2008

Mortgage Modification in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

A recent Massachusetts Bankruptcy Court decision set forth the standard that the majority of Federal Circuits have adopted: a bankruptcy debtor may avoid a wholly unsecured lien on the home.

The case involved a debtor who claimed their home was worth $370,000. The balance of the first mortgage was approximately $ 376,000, and a second mortgage, held by American Home, had a balance of approximately $95,000. In the Chapter 13 plan, the debtor proposed to pay American Home as an unsecured creditor as a “result of ‘cram down of unsecured claim on second mortgagee on Debtor’s principal residence.” The debtor also field a Motion to Determine Secured Status under Section 506(a). (Despite adequate and proper notice, American Home did not challenge the debtor’s expressed intentions.)

Even though the Bankruptcy Code expressly prohibits modification of mortgages on a debtor’s primary residence under Section 1322(b)(2), the Court found that Chapter 13 plans may avoid liens on a debtor’s residence that are wholly unsecured. As this view appears to have been adopted in other districts, the Bankruptcy Court ruled in favor of the debtor, and allowed the debtor’s motion seeking a determination that American Home’s mortgage was unsecured.

For Massachusetts homeowners contemplating bankruptcy and looking at declining property values, this decision is welcome news.

In re Pelosi, Chapter 13 case no. 07-16820 (February 21, 2008).

  • Share/Bookmark

Another Reason to Avoid “Debt Settlement”

I have written about so-called “debt settlement” companies that tout a benefit of paying off your debt quicker and cheaper. In the long run, consumers are left with less money and still at the door of the bankrutpcy court.

From the March 6 issue of Business Week:

The booming business has caught the attention of prosecutors and regulators, who say such programs can leave consumers in worse financial shape. Fees for the services run high. And when banks don’t agree to settle—if the settlement firm contacts them at all—consumers get hit with late charges and penalized with higher interest rates, leaving borrowers with even more debt than when they started.

You may have missed…

“Be Debt Free in only 18 months!”
Thinking about Debt Settlement? Think about this…
And Speaking Of Credit Counseling Predators…
Credit Counseling Predators

  • Share/Bookmark

Today’s News….

From the Globe: Massachusetts bankruptcy filings are up 22% from last year.

Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank presents his case for a housing rescue.

The slowing economy is not keeping gasoline prices from creeping up and up.

  • Share/Bookmark

Unauthorized Post Petition Transfer Leads to Denial of Discharge

Transferring real estate while contemplating bankruptcy can raise some issues. But transferring real estate after the bankruptcy case has been filed without the permission of the bankruptcy court is a big “no no.” And as a debtor in learned in a February 11 Bankruptcy Court ruling out of Worcester, it can raises some serious problems. In his case, a denial of his discharge.

The chapter 7 debtor filed the case on May 18, 2007. He owned his home along with his mother. According to his bankruptcy schedules, he valued the home at approximately $315,000 and with a mortgage of about $263,000. A mere 7 days later, the debtor transferred his interest in the home to his mother and father for $1.00. The debtor’s parents paid off the outstanding mortgages, as well as some other bills at closing.

Debtor attempted to argue that there was no equity in the home and that the appraisal should not be considered as “completely accurate”. However, the appraisal was dated 8 days prior to the case being filed, and it was an appraisal commissioned by the debtor himself. Notwithstanding this creative position, the debtor never produced any evidence demonstrating that the property would be appraised at another value (i.e., by submitted evidence of another appraisal, or of some substantive defect with the appraisal submitted).

The trustee contended that the property had equity and that the debtor intended to “hinder, delay or defraud” the creditors, the trustee and the bankruptcy estate by transferring it out of his name. Because of that not only should the debtor’s discharge be denied, but the transaction should be avoided (or set aside).

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Today’s News….

From today’s Boston Globe: Brokers at Lehi Mortgage Services Inc. have been accused of fraud by the Massachusetts Attorney General.

Lehi Mortgage “engaged in a widespread practice” of submitting false information about bank accounts and incomes that “it knew or should have known were inflated,” the attorney general’s suit said.

Again, not a good week for Countrywide. There are reports that the FBI is investigating the mortgage company over possible mortgage fraud.

Sharper Image issued a press release announcing that it will be accepting gift cards once again. WIth some restrictions. More here.

  • Share/Bookmark

6th Circuit Orders Turnover of Tax Refund

The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in the 6th Circuit affirmed an Ohio Bankruptcy Court order requiring the debtors to turn over their tax refunds to the chapter 7 trustee. The debtors filed their chapter 7 case in March 2005 and their meeting of creditors was approximately two months later. By the time of the meeting, the debtors had not yet filed their 2004 tax returns. The trustee advised the debtors that any refunds were to be turned over to the trustee upon receipt, and the debtors signed an acknowledgment of the instruction.

The tax returns were filed in July and the debtors received approximately $4,000 in refunds. The debtors claimed that their bankruptcy attorney advised them that they could exempt approximately $1,600 of the refund, and the debtors sent their counsel a check for the difference. Debtors also provided bankruptcy statements and tax returns to their attorney. Debtors were under the belief that their attorney would forward the check to the chapter 7 trustee.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

“Let Bankruptcy Judges Step In”

Congress is trying to move a bill that woujld give bankruptcy court judges more power to modify mortgages. From Law Professor Lynn LoPucki in today’s Atlantic Journal Constitution:

…the bankers want to negotiate in an environment where they, not neutral bankruptcy judges, have the final say. But the Bush administration and the bankers have had their shot at the mortgage crisis. They announced many renegotiation schemes but accomplished few renegotiations. The bankers still don’t have people in place with the knowledge, skills and incentives to deal with the crisis. The bankruptcy courts do. Congress should give the go-ahead.

Well said.

You may have missed…
Truth and Consequences: The Bankruptcy Debate Continues
Truth & Consequences Continued: Georgetown Study contradicts Mortgage Bankers Association Analysis

  • Share/Bookmark

Today’s News…

Countrywide is not having a particularly good week. The New York Times reports that the US Trustee for the Southwest Region has brought suit in Miami against the mortgage company with claims it is abusing the bankruptcy process.

Today’s editorial in The New York Times points out that despite a White House-backed mortgage industry group formed to help homeowners, these homeowners are not getting the help they need.

The IRS has decided to rehire private tax collectors.

Locally, the Boston Herald reports that the experts believe that the housing market will continue its decline in 2008.

  • Share/Bookmark

Failure to Turnover Tax Refund Leads to Discharge Revocation

In January, the 8th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed a bankruptcy court ruling that revoked the discharge of a debtor who kept his tax refund. The debtor filed his petition on October 10, 2005 and his meeting of creditors took place about one month later. At that meeting, the chapter 7 trustee advised the debtor not to spend any tax refund without contacting the trustee. The trustee gave the debtor a handout which read in part:

Warning: Do not spend any of your tax refunds until you have received approval from my office, even if you have received notice from the Bankruptcy Court that a bankruptcy discharge has been entered. The bankruptcy discharge does not close your bankruptcy case or eliminate your need to turn over non-exemption assets.

Failure to comply with the terms of this letter or to cooperate with me in the administration of your bankruptcy estate may constitute cause to revoke your bankruptcy discharge. You will receive only one notice from my office of non-exempt monies due your bankruptcy estate and upon non-compliance, I will seek to revoke your discharge.

The debtor received his discharge in January of 2006, and in February he filed his tax returns. His refunds totaled approximately $3,500, which was spent on living expenses.

In June of 2006, the trustee filed a motion to seek a Rule 2004 examination (which is similar to but not the same as a deposition) of the debtor. The trustee also requested that the debtor produce the 2005 tax returns. Debtor produced the returns, but did not appear for the examination. Later in June, the trustee made demand for $1,556.11 of the tax refunds: the amount of non-exempt assets that belonged to the bankruptcy estate. The debtor failed to do so.

In July, the trustee sought an order from the bankruptcy court seeking again to examine the debtor under Rule 2004 and requesting that the debtor bring the $1,556.11 to the examination. Debtor did not attend nor did he pay the amount.

The US Trustee filed a complaint seeking a revocation of the discharge for knowingly and fraudulently failing to deliver the refunds to the chapter 7 trustee. Debtor offered many reasons for why he spent the refunds, but those excuses were not believed. The debtor was warned, and in spite of the warning, spent the money. The discharge was revoked….all for $1,556.11. The case is Fokkena v. Klages, 8th Cir. BAP, 07-6051 SI.

  • Share/Bookmark

Today’s News…

From PalmBeachPost.com: Family pets and animal shelters continue to feel the strain of the foreclosure crisis.

Has someone given you a Sharper Image gift card? That’s a bummer.

As Congress debates some amendments to the bankruptcy code, there’s news that bankruptcy filings spiked in February….at the highest rate since the law changed in 2005.

There has been some news about Countrywide (see the post from earlier today). They haven’t said anything in response to the Atlanta, Georgia US Trustee’s suit against them but they don’t have a problem spending a reported $ 1.3 million on lobbyists last year.

  • Share/Bookmark