Comments on: A Loophole in Massachusetts Court Rules and a Call for Reform http://mcleodlawoffices.com/2005/11/a-loophole-in-massachusetts-court-rules-and-a-call-for-reform/ McLeod Law Offices, Boston, Massachusetts. Consumer Bankruptcy, Business Bankruptcy, Litigation: Bankruptcy, Consumer & Debt. Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:01:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Shaheda Rizvi http://mcleodlawoffices.com/2005/11/a-loophole-in-massachusetts-court-rules-and-a-call-for-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Shaheda Rizvi Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:52:13 +0000 http://mcleodlawoffices.com/?p=16#comment-3 Excellent Information-- My personal situation is far worse--The attorney lied to the court that he had submitted --Interrogatories (Rule 33(a)) to me -he never did--then moved in with a default 55(a)-- Invoking Rule 60(b)(3) and Motion to Compel Rule 34 -- and opposition therien were not sufficient to remove the default. The judges continued to deny my Motions, including Motions to correct the record.. Are there cases online--that might be similar to mine--that might help me to remove this default--? Excellent Information– My personal situation is far worse–The attorney lied to the court that he had submitted –Interrogatories (Rule 33(a)) to me -he never did–then moved in with a default 55(a)–

Invoking Rule 60(b)(3) and Motion to Compel Rule 34 — and opposition therien were not sufficient to remove the default. The judges continued to deny my Motions, including Motions to correct the record..

Are there cases online–that might be similar to mine–that might help me to remove this default–?

]]>